Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unipolar Conceptual Metaphors in Biblical Hebrew

Bibliographic Data

ID16969490
AuthorsAt Lamprecht, Adriaan Lamprecht (0000-0003-3880-6993, North-West University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume30
Issue2
Publication date2022-01-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal for Semitics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1013-8471 • E-ISSN: 2663-6573
PublisherUnisa Press (PUBLISHER • ZA)
DOI10.25159/2663-6573/9563
OpenAlexW4210302580
LanguageEN
References cited28

The cognitive approach to metaphor has faced many challenges: one of these challenges is a lack of more cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research that needs to be done to better understand the claim of the cognitive approach that abstract concepts and abstract reasoning are partly metaphorical. This paper provides evidence that a universal spatial metaphorical system exists (the claim of Cognitive Linguistics) and shows that the theory of conceptual metaphor accommodates the findings to a certain extent. However, this theory of conceptual metaphor does not account for the entire Biblical Hebrew conceptual system and needs to be rethought. This study extends the existing knowledge of conceptual metaphor. Specifically, it expands the knowledge concerning verbs conflating a bipolar conceptual component, that is, MOTION and PATH. This study discusses evidence from the Hebrew Bible, and argues that the Biblical Hebrew verbs (yrd) (descend) and ('lh)(ascend)’s bipolar lexical concepts MOTION DOWN and MOTION UP, respectively, may split into two unipolar lexical concepts MOTION and DOWN and MOTION and UP, respectively, and in which only one unipolar lexical concept, that is DOWN or UP, respectively, is used for metaphorical conceptual mapping

Biblical Hebrew · Biblical studies · Cognition · Cognitive linguistics · Cognitive science · Cognitive semantics · Conceptual metaphor · Conceptual system · Epistemology · Hebrew · Hebrew Bible · Linguistics · Metaphor · Motion (physics) · Theology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Families in Therapy and Culture · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism

  • Cognitive Grammar

    John R Taylor•Cognitive grammar•2002

  • Grammar and Conceptualization

    Ronald W Langacker•Grammar and Conceptualization•1999

  • Toward a Cognitive Semantics

    Léonard Talmy•Toward a cognitive semantics•2000

  • Cognitive Linguistics

    Open Access•William Croft, Diana Cruse et al.•Cognitive Linguistics•2004

  • The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English

    Open Access•George Lakoff, Zoltán Kövecses•Cultural Models in Language and…•1987

  • On metaphoric representation

    Open Access•Gregory L Murphy•Cognition•1996

  • The Body in the Mind

    Mark Johnson, Mark H Johnson•Body in the Mind•1987

  • The journey of Jephthah’s daughter

    Open Access•Adriaan Lamprecht•HTS Teologiese Studies /…•2021

  • Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things

    George Lakoff•Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things•1987

  • Metaphor

    Zoltán Kövecses•Metaphor•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae