Philosophical and Philological Debates on Kulliyyāt I.1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn
From Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī to Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17526364 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Osama Eshera (0000-0002-9978-9640, University of Maryland, College Park Maryland USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Pages | 1-85 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Oriens (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0078-6527 • E-ISSN: 1877-8372 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/18778372-12340025 |
| OpenAlex | W4380627422 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
The debates on Kulliyyāt I .1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn (“on the subjects of medicine”) were initiated by Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī and continued by Afḍal al-Dīn al-Ḫūnaǧī, Naǧm al-Dīn al-Naḫǧawānī, Yaʿqūb ibn Ġanāʾim al-Sāmirī, Rafīʿ al-Dīn al-Ǧīlī, Ibn al-Nafīs, and Ibn al-Quff al-Masīḥī. In his own commentary, entitled al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya , Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī preserved and scrutinized his predecessors’ commentaries, in order to offer what he believed to be more conclusive interpretations of Ibn Sīnā. Focusing on the introductory part of Kulliyyāt I .1.ii, we show that the commentators were divided not only on philosophical issues, but also on the very text that should be attributed to Ibn Sīnā
Arabic literature · Feminism · Islam · Order (exchange) · Philology · Political science · Theology · Families in Therapy and Culture · Islamic Thought and Society Studies · Law · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |