Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rethinking university space

Learning from the spatial debates of the 1960s for contemporary futures

Bibliographic Data

ID17587290
AuthorsAslı Alanlı (0000-0002-9514-1089, Middle East Technical University, corresponding author), Inci Basa (0000-0002-0487-8705, Middle East Technical University)
Year2026
Pages1-27
Publication date2026-04-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePlanning Perspectives (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0266-5433 • E-ISSN: 1466-4518
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02665433.2026.2655325
OpenAlexW7153442696
LanguageEN
References cited29

This article reconsiders university space by moving away from viewing it as a fixed architectural form or a purely institutional framework. It is approached instead as a contested field that takes shape through the interaction of spatial, social, and institutional processes, drawing on perspectives from spatial theory. The 1960s provide the main point of entry – a period marked by rapid expansion and experimentation in higher education. Rather than following a linear historical account, the discussion traces recurring spatial tensions – between autonomy and urban integration, reproduction and openness to change, and concentration and dispersion. These tensions remain in play, shaping how university space is produced through the interaction of different spatial logics rather than straightforward processes. Bringing these debates into the present shifts how current discussions can be read. Issues such as campus–city relations, hybrid learning, or technological and ecological change do not appear new; they extend earlier spatial questions in different ways. What follows is not a fixed definition of university space. It appears instead as something that takes shape through ongoing relations and processes. Campuses, in this sense, can be seen as formations that continue to change, embedded within wider urban and societal contexts

Futures contract · Historical Geography and Geographical Thought · Spatial and Cultural Studies · Urban Planning and Governance

  • Geography Matters!

    Open Access•James Anderson, James M Anderson et al.•Geography Matters!•1984

  • Non-Representational Theory

    Nigel Thrift•Non-Representational Theory•2008

  • Protecting the University as a Physical Place in the Age of Postdigitization

    Open Access•Ryan M Allen, Peter Mclaren•Postdigital Science and Education•2022

  • Same but Different

    Dalal Elarji, Christoph Michels•Architecture and Culture•2021

  • Resilient university campus in the city in Covid and post-Covid era—recommendations, guidelines, and evidence from research in Italy and Poland

    Open Access•Lamberto Amistadi, Tomasz Bradecki et al.•URBAN DESIGN International•2023

  • Outline of a Theory of Practice

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu, Richard Nice•On Violence•2007

  • Nomadic subjects

    R Braidotti, M Eagleton et al.•Choice Reviews Online•1995

  • Cartographies of belonging

    K W Guyotte, M A Flint et al.•Critical Studies in Education•2019

  • Gown and Town

    Open Access•Laurence Brockliss•Minerva•2000

  • Learning in the ‘Real’ World

    Isabelle Doucet•Journal of Educational…•2016

  • Place-people-practice-process

    Renae Acton•Educational Philosophy and Theory•2017

  • Reimagining the new pedagogical possibilities for universities post-Covid-19

    Michael A Peters, Fazal Rizvi et al.•Educational Philosophy and Theory•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae