Identifying higher education research priorities at a regional Australian university
A modified-Delphi study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17622767 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dara Tafazoli (0000-0001-7082-2286, corresponding author), Charlotte Rees (0000-0003-4828-1422), Susan Ledger (0000-0001-7050-1001), Liam Phelan (0000-0002-9306-3216), Tegan Bradley (0000-0002-1450-3691), Kathleen Butler (0000-0002-6907-0846), Bonnie McBain (0000-0002-9751-5128), Julie Reis (0000-0001-8007-7339), Julie Mirelly da Silva Reis (0000-0002-2030-6096), Jude Weidenhofer (0000-0003-1218-4903), T K Young (0000-0003-2727-8347), Tamara Young (0000-0001-8132-4194) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Australian Educational Researcher (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0311-6999 • E-ISSN: 2210-5328 |
| Publisher | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s13384-026-00964-3 |
| OpenAlex | W7155648790 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 36 |
Setting priorities is crucial for optimising research in resource-constrained environments, so we identify higher education (HE) research priorities at one regional Australian university. Employing constructivism, we conducted a three-round modified-Delphi with an expert panel (n = 64) using online questionnaires. Analysis included descriptive statistics (quantitative items), and content/theme analysis (qualitative). We collected 37 panellist-identified priorities (Round 1): the top three were AI in HE, how best to teach innovatively, and equity in HE. Across all three rounds, 48 priorities were considered with 31 achieving high importance and consensus: the top three were student engagement, how to teach creative/critical thinking skills, and how technology impacts HE. Key rationales underlying panellists’ priorities were conducting research to improve student learning, workforce preparedness, and aligning with institutional values. Findings align partly with international priority-setting exercises, but also reveal novel insights specific to the regional context. Although institution-specific, findings offer broader relevance and a replicable methodology for other HE institutions identifying research priorities
Descriptive statistics · Higher education · Trend analysis · Workforce · Workforce development · Delphi Technique in Research · Global Health and Surgery · Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Reimagining our futures together
Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care
ChatGPT
The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching
Optimal number of response categories in rating scales
Priority setting in higher education research using a mixed methods approach
Developments in medical education in response to the Covid-19 pandemic
Covid-19 and digital disruption in UK universities
Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research
The Delphi technique in health sciences education research
Whole Institution Approach
Invisible innovation
The Delphi Technique in Educational Research
Feeling Thermometers Versus 7-Point Scales
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |