“Protect Our Women…From the Immigrants!?”
The Association Between Sexism, Xenophobia, and the Perception of Sexual Street Harassment From In-Group Versus Out-Group Men
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17629048 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Plieger (0000-0001-9055-7619, Hochschule Niederrhein, corresponding author), Lina Stens (University of Bonn), Silja Petrig (University of Bonn), Diana Fichtner (University of Bonn), Moritz Hess (0000-0003-4095-6448, Hochschule Niederrhein), Martin Reuter (0000-0003-1050-9655, University of Bonn) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sex Roles (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0360-0025 • E-ISSN: 1573-2762 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11199-026-01650-5 |
| OpenAlex | W7154043758 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 42 |
Catcalling as a form of sexual street harassment has been shown to seriously affect women’s perception of safety and well-being. The present study aimed to investigate whether inter-group attitudes and perceived origin of the catcalling person influence the way people perceive such behavior. We presented 1,246 participants vignettes of catcalling being performed by in-group versus out-group members and let them rate these vignettes with respect to the harassment perceived. Participants furthermore provided self-report data on ambivalent sexism and xenophobia. The results show negative associations of sexism and xenophobia with perceived reprehensibility of catcalling behavior and negative feelings toward the catcallers. Out-group catcallers were evaluated more negatively. Xenophobic and hostile sexist attitudes led to a greater difference in the negative evaluation of in-group versus out-group perpetrators. Partial correlations revealed that the overall evaluation is mainly driven by hostile sexism, whereas the differential evaluation of in-group versus out-group perpetrators mainly relied on xenophobia. The system-justifying and conservative core of inter-group attitudes seems to lead to a heightened tolerance of catcalling behavior. Importantly, out-group perpetrators are evaluated more negatively for norm violating behavior indicating double standards in the view on sexual harassment. This bears implications for the importance of awareness about stereotypes within the context of intervention programs to reduce gendered violence
Affect (linguistics) · Ambivalence · Association (psychology) · Context (archaeology) · Feeling · Harassment · Hostility · Norm (philosophy) · Perception · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social and Intergroup Psychology
Experiencing the Streets
Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice
Personality, Ideology, Prejudice, and Politics
Evaluations of the Authenticity of News Media Articles and Variables of Xenophobia in a German Sample
Motivations behind catcalling
Understanding Street Harassment as Gendered Violence
Context Effects on Women’s Perceptions of Stranger Harassment
I Want to be Able to Walk the Street Without Fear”
The Ripple Effects of Stranger Harassment on Objectification of Self and Others
Upsetting Behavior
Effects of Street Harassment on Anxiety, Depression, and Sleep Quality of College Women
Bystander Sexism in the Intergroup Context
Blurred lines
The end of ‘Welcome Culture’? How the Cologne assaults reframed Germany’s immigration discourse
On the Development of Xenophobia in Germany
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
Social dominance orientation
Bad but Bold
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy
An ambivalent alliance
Everyday Stranger Harassment and Women's Objectification
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |