“There is no evidence to suggest …”
Changing The Way We Judge Information For Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17664463 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leslie Cannold (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 165-184 |
| Publication date | 1997-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Hypatia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0887-5367 • E-ISSN: 1527-2001 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00025.x |
| PMID | 11660600 |
| OpenAlex | W2103505722 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
Feminist health activists and medical researchers frequently disagree on the adequacy of the informed consent processes in clinical trials. I argue for an informed consent process that reflects the central importance of patient-participant autonomy. Such a standard may raise concerns for medical researchers about their capacity to control the quantity and quality of the information they disclose to potential participants. These difficulties might be addressed by presenting potential participants with differently sized disclosure packages
Alternative medicine · Autonomy · Epistemology · Family medicine · Informed consent · Medical information · Political science · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Law · Medicine · Psychology
Feminist Approaches to Science
Feminist Epistemologies
Can Clinical Research Be Both Ethical and Scientific? A Commentary inspired by Rosser and Marquis
Redirecting Feminist Critiques of Science
Can There Be A Feminist Science
Living laboratories
Men Who Control Women's Health
Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge
Feminist perspectives in medical ethics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|