Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rethinking Evaluation in Simultaneous Speech Translation

A Case for Monotonic Test Sets

Bibliographic Data

ID17665677
AuthorsMana Makinae (Nara Institute of Science and Technology. [email protected], corresponding author), Yusuke Sakai (0000-0001-7752-4572, Nara Institute of Science and Technology. [email protected]), Hidetaka Kamigaito (0000-0002-5249-5813, Nara Institute of Science and Technology. [email protected]), Taro Watanabe (Nara Institute of Science and Technology. [email protected])
Year2026
Pages1-30
Publication date2026-04-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueComputational Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0891-2017 • E-ISSN: 1530-9312
PublisherAssociation for Computational Linguistics (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/coli.a.622
OpenAlexW7154494851
LanguageEN

Overcoming the trade-off between quality and latency is a challenge in simultaneous speech translation. Common approaches in previous works have been to segment the source sentence or align target sentences with the source’s syntax as closely as possible, enabling faster translations while maintaining quality. However, a major limitation in these studies is the reliance on existing translation test data, which often include reordering and are unsuitable for simultaneous settings with low latency. Alternatively, some use interpretation data transcribed from interpreters, which is also problematic due to translation errors and omissions, making both inadequate for fully evaluating simultaneous models. In this work, we introduce a construction, verification, and analysis of a new test set specifically designed for simultaneous settings, with a focus on maintaining word and phrase order consistency with the source. The test set comprises three language pairs representing different levels of word order similarity to the source by leveraging large language models, with quality verified by professional interpreters. This provides an interpreter-grounded perspective, and empirically shows the ideal level of monotonicity and the other sentence style characteristics including syntax simplicity and sentence length. It also reveals the capabilities and limitations of LLMs on monotonic translation. Experiments revealed that existing test data tends to underestimate a model’s performance, while the proposed test set, simul-tst-COMMON, offers a more appropriate evaluation of simultaneous models. Moreover, the quality gap between wait-k and Local Agreement suggests that the adaptive policy more closely resembles the monotonic translation behavior of human interpreters. Finally, the analysis highlights the limitations of current metrics, which may not be fully suitable for evaluating simultaneous tasks

Machine translation · Monotonic function · Phrase · Sentence · Syntax · Word order · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Speech Recognition and Synthesis · Topic Modeling

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae