Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Enhancing Academic Integrity

Drivers, Barriers, and Governance Pathways in China

Bibliographic Data

ID17675898
AuthorsXu Liu (0000-0002-1567-7925, Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen China), Jia Hao Luo (Chongqing Technology and Business University Chongqing China), Tan Yun (College of Education Science Chongqing Normal University Chongqing China), Lan Xiang (0000-0002-7149-8235, Krirk University, corresponding author), Xiang Lan (International College Krirk University Bangkok Thailand)
Year2026
Volume80
Issue2
Publication date2026-02-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHigher Education Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5224 • E-ISSN: 1468-2273
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hequ.70107
OpenAlexW7128493956
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited18

In recent years, the rapid growth in global research output has been accompanied by an increasing challenge of research integrity. This study, taking China as an example, systematically examines the drivers, barriers, and governance strategies of research integrity through policy text analysis and in‐depth interviews, revealing a complex network of problems composed of institutional pressure, alienation of evaluation systems, and technical challenges. It finds the culture of ‘publish or perish’ resulting from a quantitative assessment system, uneven distribution of research resources, and lack of enough academic ethics education to be the main barriers to research integrity. Although the government has established a multi‐level governance system, policy implementation still faces challenges. With the rapid development of AI technology, new forms of academic misconduct pose challenges to the traditional regulatory model. Based on the research findings, this paper proposes suggestions to promote research integrity, ranging from passive compliance to active self‐discipline

Alienation · China · Corporate governance · Misconduct · Network governance · Research ethics · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Misinformation and Its Impacts

  • Research Integrity in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•Aliya Kuzhabekova, Sarah Elaine Eaton et al.•Higher Education Quarterly•2026

  • The Chinese Dilemma of Research Misconduct

    Open Access•Zhaoheng Xu, Elena Denisova-Schmidt•Higher Education Quarterly•2026

  • Research and scholarly methods

    Open Access•Omolola A Adeoye‐Olatunde, Nicole L Olenik•JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN…•2021

  • Semi-structured Interviews

    Open Access•Danielle Magaldi, Matthew Berler•Encyclopedia of Personality and…•2020

  • Thematic analysis.

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•APA Handbook of Research Methods…•2012

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences

    Kristy Holtfreter, Michael D Reisig et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae