Digital Competency of Psychologists
A Scoping Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17696272 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amanda Ķule (0009-0003-9693-9994, Riga Stradiņš University, corresponding author), Kristīne Mārtinsone (0000-0003-4145-8440, Riga Stradiņš University), Elīna Akmane (0000-0003-0895-9251, Riga Stradiņš University), Aija Ozola (0000-0002-3751-0392, Riga Stradiņš University), Inga Znotiņa (0000-0003-4968-782X, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia), D Kamerade (0000-0003-2019-3391, Riga Stradiņš University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-06 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1016-9040 • E-ISSN: 1878-531X |
| Publisher | Hogrefe Verlag (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1027/1016-9040/a000575 |
| OpenAlex | W7118970518 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 61 |
Digital competency is becoming increasingly vital in psychological practice, yet consensus is lacking on the specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for effective technology integration in psychological care and therapeutic settings. Existing frameworks primarily focus on telepsychology and telehealth, neglecting broader psychological practice. This scoping review addresses this gap by synthesizing relevant literature, identifying key digital competencies, evaluating existing frameworks, and highlighting gaps to inform the development of an integrated competency framework for psychologists. A PRISMA-ScR guided research was conducted in August 2024 across seven major databases: Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest One Academic, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Taylor & Francis Online, and EBSCOhost. Two independent reviewers screened 577 articles, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis identified eleven digital competencies, hierarchically grouped into five key domains: technical, ethical and legal, digital practice, training and research, and infrastructure and equity. By mapping these competencies and highlighting gaps in existing frameworks, this study provides a structured basis for developing standardized competency models. This ensures that future frameworks incorporate the necessary skills and knowledge for psychologists to navigate evolving technologies, AI integration, and cross-cultural digital practice effectively
Best practice · Focus group · Thematic analysis · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Mental health before and during the Covid-19 pandemic
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Interrater reliability
A review of rural, remote, and northern competency in Canada
The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency
Toward establishing telepsychology guideline. Turning the challenges of Covid-19 into opportunity
Ethical Practice in Telepsychology
Telepsychology
Scoping studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|