Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Complications in the Use of Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft vs. Connective Tissue Graft

A One-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID17801098
AuthorsSilvestre Ripoll (Consejería de Salud y Consumo), Ángela Fernández de Velasco-Tarilonte (0000-0002-0465-0196, Universidad de Sevilla, corresponding author), Beatriz Bullón (0000-0002-3996-3280, Universidad de Sevilla), Blanca Ríos‐Carrasco (0000-0002-2832-5902, Universidad de Sevilla), Ana Fernández-Palacín (Universidad de Sevilla)
Year2021
Volume18
Issue9
Pages4504-4504
Publication date2021-04-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph18094504
PMID33922745
OpenAlexW3158552565
LanguageEN
References cited33

In the treatment of gingival recession, different surgical options have been described: free gingival grafts (FGG), connective tissue Grafts (CTG), and a more recent technique, de-epithelialized free gingival graft (DFGG). They are not procedures exempt from the appearance of complications. Most publications refer to postoperative complications, and there is limited literature regarding the development of late complications (weeks or months). Our working group carried out a study to describe the development of late complications associated with the use of DFGG in comparison with CTG, providing an incidence rate and a classification. Sixty-eight patients with mucogingival problems were selected, and divided into two groups: the Test Group, for which we used DFGG + Coronal Advancement Flap (CAF), and the Control Group (CTG + CAF). All patients were treated at the University of Seville's dental school to solve mucogingival problems for aesthetic and/or functional reasons. A classification is proposed based on its severity; Major and Minor. Major complications included reepithelialization of the graft, epithelial bands, cul-de-sac, epithelial cysts, and bone exostoses. Minor complications included the graft ́s color changes and superficial revascularization. Late major complications were only associated with the use of the DFGG, and the late minor complications developed with the use of the DFGG were much higher than those associated with CTG. CTG appears to be a safer procedure than DFGG in terms of late complications

Clinical trial · Connective tissue · Coronal plane · Gingival recession · Randomized controlled trial · Dentistry · Medicine · Oral and gingival health research · Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Internal Medicine · Surgery

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae