It's the Politics!—Global Trade Governance Beyond Technocracy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17809672 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nora Kürzdörfer (0000-0001-8958-2817, Munich Security Conference, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1758-5880 • E-ISSN: 1758-5899 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1758-5899.70169 |
| OpenAlex | W7159636981 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 66 |
The World Trade Organization (WTO) struggles to respond to the growing entanglement of trade and geopolitics. Drawing on existing scholarship and 20 in‐depth interviews with ambassadors and senior trade diplomats conducted in Geneva ahead of the 13th WTO Ministerial 2024, this article reveals a fundamental dilemma at the heart of contemporary trade governance. While the WTO remains institutionally anchored in a technocratic and market‐oriented understanding of trade—treating political and security concerns as exceptional or external—its core functions are increasingly shaped by political contestation among members. The analysis argues that technocratic siloization, reflected in the separation of trade from security and foreign policy concerns, constrains the organization's ability to address geoeconomic developments. Major power rivalries, particularly between the United States and China, and persistent divisions between developed and developing countries, have contributed to decision‐making paralysis and weakened judicial functions. Existing reform proposals largely focus on procedural fixes, while neglecting the underlying political drivers of institutional dysfunction. Amid persistent deadlock, some even call for replacing the WTO with an alternative organization. The article argues that safeguarding the WTO's relevance requires moving trade governance out of its technocratic silo by creating space for structured deliberation on the political dimensions of trade
Corporate governance · Deliberation · Dilemma · Politics · Safeguarding · Scholarship · Technocracy · Global trade and economics · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · World Trade Organization Law
The Biden Administration’s Trade Policy
Organizational Silos
A securitisation approach to international energy politics
The Geoeconomic Turn in EU Trade and Investment Policy
Governments and Markets in the Digital Age
Economic Lawfare
Improving Generalizability in Transnational Bureaucratic Influence Research
Connecting International Relations and Public Administration
Wither the Trade Regime
Resilience and the role of the European Union in the world
Governing cyberspace
Explaining the resilience of free trade
Gender in global trade
Rights redux
Private infrastructure in weaponized interdependence
Donald Trump and the survival strategies of international organisations
Reform of global trade governance
Weaponized Interdependence
Differential treatment for developing countries in the WTO
The WTO as Linkage Machine
Institutional Linkage
From Politics to Technocracy—and Back Again
Who Guards the “Guardians of the System”? The Role of the Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement
Continuity and Change in the World Trade Organization
Breaking out of silos
Resilience of the Silo Organizational Structure in the European Commission
The dog that does not bark – Weaponised interdependence and digital trade at the World Trade Organization
Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews
Interview Methods in Political Science
A partial conversion
The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations
How not to negotiate
Social Capital and the Global Economy
From Data Management to Actionable Findings
How Many Interviews Are Enough
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |