Understanding Generalized Trust in News Media in China
Psychometric Validation and Association With News Avoidance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17811440 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wenlong Mu (0000-0003-4027-6557, Wuhan University, corresponding author), Jingtong Wang (Wuhan University), Wenlan Zhu (0009-0007-1573-0945, Wuhan University), Rongyong Li (China Resources (China)) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 163-175 |
| Publication date | 2025-02-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1864-1105 • E-ISSN: 2151-2388 |
| Publisher | Hogrefe Verlag (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1027/1864-1105/a000459 |
| OpenAlex | W4407135859 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 22 |
Trust in news media (TNM) has continued declining in some countries (e.g., US) while remaining stable or even increasing in others (e.g., China). Scholars are interested in understanding what factors contribute to these differences. A reliable and equivalent measurement is essential for cross-national comparisons of TNM. However, there is currently no instrument available to measure generalized TNM in China. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Generalized Trust in News Media Scale (GTNMS) in China. The study sample comprised 578 participants, including 347 females (60.0%) and 231 males (40.0%). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), bifactor-CFA, and bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling (bifactor-ESEM) were adopted to examine the construct validity of the Chinese version of GTNMS. Measurement invariance (MI) and predictive validity of the Chinese version of GTNMS were also examined. The results revealed that the Chinese adaptation of GTNMS demonstrated optimal representation through a bifactor-ESEM, comprising a global factor (G-factor) and four specific factors (S-factors). Both the G-factor and S-factors showed acceptable internal consistency reliability. However, the S-factors retained a lower level of specificity after controlling for the G-factor, which indicated that the GTNMS was essentially unidimensional. The results from the Structural Equation Modelling analysis also revealed that only the G-factor could predict individuals’ news avoidance. In addition, MI of the GTNMS was established across participants using official and commercial media. Overall, the GTNMS is a reliable tool for measuring generalized TNM in China
China · Media studies · News media · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics
Understanding Emptiness in a Chinese Sample
The origins of media trust in a young democracy
News media trust and its impact on media use
On measuring trust and distrust in journalism
Caught in the Nexus
How to Measure Generalized Trust in News Media? An Adaptation and Test of Scales
Examining First- and Second-Order Factor Structures for News Credibility
Give Me a Break!” Prevalence and Predictors of Intentional News Avoidance During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Mainstream Media Skepticism and Exposure to Sectorial and Extranational News Media
Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age
Political Participation and Ideological News Online
Trust-oriented affordances
I really don’t like them!’ – Exploring citizens’ media criticism
Democratic Consequences of Hostile Media Perceptions
Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media
Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span
Marketing Credibility
When Nationalism Encounters the Covid-19 Pandemic
Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Digital Hoarding Scale
Do People Watch what they Do Not Trust
Journalism beyond democracy
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |