Ad hoc concepts and linguistic relativity
Towards an experiential and situated view of language–cognition interactions
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 17811490 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Panos Athanasopoulos (0000-0003-1601-0476, Lund University, autor correspondente), Monique Flecken (University of Amsterdam), Norbert Vanek (0000-0002-7805-184X, University of Auckland) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Language and Cognition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1866-9808 • E-ISSN: 1866-9859 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/langcog.2026.10067 |
| OpenAlex | W7140171979 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
This article serves as an introduction to the special issue on ad hoc concepts and linguistic relativity. We argue that empirical research on linguistic relativity can be re-interpreted through the lens of ad hoc cognition, a framework originating in Barsalou’s ( Memory & Cognition , 11 , 211–227, 1983) account of goal-derived categories and expanded by Casasanto and Lupyan’s ( The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts. MIT Press, 2015) proposal that all conceptual representations are context-sensitive constructions. We begin by placing the argument in historical context, outlining how prototype theory and ad hoc categorisation challenge accounts of fixed, feature-based conceptual structure, motivating instead a view of concepts as dynamically assembled in response to situational demands. We then introduce the studies comprising this special issue, which collectively investigate language–thought interactions across diverse perceptual, conceptual and linguistic domains using a wide array of linguistic typologies and experimental methodologies. Across these contributions, a coherent pattern emerges: linguistic effects on cognition are graded rather than categorical, shaped by task demands, memory load, the availability of verbal resources and the experiential histories of speakers. We argue that this perspective reframes the Whorfian question, shifting from a binary ‘does language affect thought?’ to a systematic investigation of when, how, and to what degree language dynamically modulates conceptual processing
Cognition · Conceptual metaphor · Experiential learning · Linguistic relativity · Situated · Situational ethics · Categorization, perception, and language · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future
Effects of Language on Visual Perception
Ad hoc categories
Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination
Language, thought, and color
Cognitive representations of semantic categories.
Perceiving colour through a language lens
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Direction of reading, not writing, shapes concepts of time
The influence of three-gendered grammatical systems on simultaneous bilingual cognition
When the days are(n’t) numbered
Situating language in higher-order cognition
Not all verbal labels grease the wheels of odor categories
Feminine fox, not so feminine box
Language, but not music, shapes tactile perception
Interactions Between Language and Mental Representations
The Structure of a Semantic Theory
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |