How Dare You, iCub? Robots Face Harsher Judgments than Humans in Social Exclusion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17812244 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francesca Cocchella (0000-0002-3530-6523, Italian Institute of Technology), Sara Mongile (0000-0003-3611-2752, Italian Institute of Technology), Giulia Pusceddu (0000-0002-5426-5448, Italian Institute of Technology, corresponding author), Linda Lastrico (0000-0002-4465-2727, Italian Institute of Technology), Giulia Belgiovine (0000-0002-6376-9963, Italian Institute of Technology), Ana Tanevska (0000-0002-2628-4123, Uppsala University), Luca Andrighetto (0000-0001-6257-6097, University of Genoa), Francesco Rea (0000-0001-8535-223X, Italian Institute of Technology), Alessandra Sciutti (0000-0002-1056-3398, Italian Institute of Technology) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Social Robotics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-4791 • E-ISSN: 1875-4805 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12369-025-01347-x |
| OpenAlex | W7130453746 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 71 |
Human beings are naturally predisposed to affiliate with others; due to this inclination, social exclusion is perceived as an unsettling experience. The recent advancements in robotics highlight how robots have started to be considered social agents, raising the necessity to investigate social mechanisms behind Human-Robot Interactions. This study explores whether being excluded by a social robot elicits similar negative outcomes as being excluded by a human. Using an experimental design inspired by the Cyberball Paradigm, we conducted a between-subjects experiment with sixty-two participants, where the humanoid robot iCub and a human confederate excluded the participants. According to the condition, one of the two partially re-included them. Our findings indicate that when the robot excluded participants completely, they experienced more threats to their fundamental needs and judged the robot more negatively compared to the condition where the confederate totally excluded them. Additionally, the analysis suggests that previous encounters with iCub influenced participant strategies during the exclusion. Those who had interacted with the robot before were more likely to prefer the robot when excluded by it and the confederate when excluded by them, possibly reflecting a preference for the excluder. Participants with no prior experience tended to favor the robot in both conditions. Behavioral analyses provided additional details on the dynamics of the interaction, revealing that participants increased their physical distance from the interaction table over rounds, accompanied by a decrease in happy expressions and an increase in sad expressions. This study provides meaningful insights into the behavioral dynamics of robotic exclusion and its perception, gaining awareness of the importance of designing social robots that can recognize and mitigate social exclusion when interacting with humans
Human–robot interaction · Humanoid robot · iCub · Preference · Robot · Robotics · Social exclusion · Social robot · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Social Exclusion
Social robots for education
Socially intelligent robots
Ostracism
Getting a Cue
Chapter 6 Ostracism
Dimensions of Mind Perception
Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social outcomes of the social sharing of emotion
Measuring the Closeness of Relationships
Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection
The Need to Belong
Rejection Elicits Emotional Reactions but Neither Causes Immediate Distress nor Lowers Self-Esteem
Mental State Attribution to Robots
Why didn't you tag me
I, Robot
A Study on Social Inclusion of Humanoid Robots
Should I Blame the Human or the Robot? Attribution Within a Human–Robot Group
Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions
Self-disclosure and liking
Social cues establish expectations of rejection and affect the response to being rejected
It will (never) stop hurting
Lonely hearts and angry minds
Upright and left out
When ostracism leads to aggression
How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence
Excluded emotions
Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction
Mind Perception in HRI
Cyberostracism
Intimacy as an interpersonal process
Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness
Effects of self-disclosure role on liking, closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions
Chronic social exclusion and evidence for the resignation stage
Exclude Me If You Can
Excluded From All Humanity
Feeling Thermometers Versus 7-Point Scales
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |