Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Dare You, iCub? Robots Face Harsher Judgments than Humans in Social Exclusion

Bibliographic Data

ID17812244
AuthorsFrancesca Cocchella (0000-0002-3530-6523, Italian Institute of Technology), Sara Mongile (0000-0003-3611-2752, Italian Institute of Technology), Giulia Pusceddu (0000-0002-5426-5448, Italian Institute of Technology, corresponding author), Linda Lastrico (0000-0002-4465-2727, Italian Institute of Technology), Giulia Belgiovine (0000-0002-6376-9963, Italian Institute of Technology), Ana Tanevska (0000-0002-2628-4123, Uppsala University), Luca Andrighetto (0000-0001-6257-6097, University of Genoa), Francesco Rea (0000-0001-8535-223X, Italian Institute of Technology), Alessandra Sciutti (0000-0002-1056-3398, Italian Institute of Technology)
Year2026
Volume18
Issue2
Publication date2026-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Social Robotics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-4791 • E-ISSN: 1875-4805
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s12369-025-01347-x
OpenAlexW7130453746
LanguageEN
References cited71

Human beings are naturally predisposed to affiliate with others; due to this inclination, social exclusion is perceived as an unsettling experience. The recent advancements in robotics highlight how robots have started to be considered social agents, raising the necessity to investigate social mechanisms behind Human-Robot Interactions. This study explores whether being excluded by a social robot elicits similar negative outcomes as being excluded by a human. Using an experimental design inspired by the Cyberball Paradigm, we conducted a between-subjects experiment with sixty-two participants, where the humanoid robot iCub and a human confederate excluded the participants. According to the condition, one of the two partially re-included them. Our findings indicate that when the robot excluded participants completely, they experienced more threats to their fundamental needs and judged the robot more negatively compared to the condition where the confederate totally excluded them. Additionally, the analysis suggests that previous encounters with iCub influenced participant strategies during the exclusion. Those who had interacted with the robot before were more likely to prefer the robot when excluded by it and the confederate when excluded by them, possibly reflecting a preference for the excluder. Participants with no prior experience tended to favor the robot in both conditions. Behavioral analyses provided additional details on the dynamics of the interaction, revealing that participants increased their physical distance from the interaction table over rounds, accompanied by a decrease in happy expressions and an increase in sad expressions. This study provides meaningful insights into the behavioral dynamics of robotic exclusion and its perception, gaining awareness of the importance of designing social robots that can recognize and mitigate social exclusion when interacting with humans

Human–robot interaction · Humanoid robot · iCub · Preference · Robot · Robotics · Social exclusion · Social robot · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

  • Social Exclusion

    Open Access•Paola Riva, Paolo Riva et al.•Social Exclusion•2016

  • Social robots for education

    Tony Belpaeme, James Kennedy et al.•Science Robotics•2018

  • Socially intelligent robots

    Open Access•Kerstin Dautenhahn•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2007

  • Ostracism

    Open Access•Kimberly D Williams, Kipling D Williams•Social and Personality Psychology…•2007

  • Getting a Cue

    Open Access•Cynthia L Pickett, Wendi L Gardner et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2004

  • Chapter 6 Ostracism

    Kimberly D Williams, Kipling D Williams•Advances in Experimental Social…•2009

  • Dimensions of Mind Perception

    Open Access•Heather M Gray, Kurt Gray et al.•Science•2007

  • Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social outcomes of the social sharing of emotion

    Open Access•Bernard Rimé, Pierre Bouchat et al.•Current Opinion in Psychology•2020

  • Measuring the Closeness of Relationships

    Open Access•Simon Gächter, Chris Starmer et al.•PLoS ONE•2015

  • Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection

    Laura Smart Richman, Mark R Leary•Psychological Review•2009

  • The Need to Belong

    Roy F Baumeister, Mark R Leary•Interpersonal Development•2017

  • Rejection Elicits Emotional Reactions but Neither Causes Immediate Distress nor Lowers Self-Esteem

    Open Access•Ginette C Blackhart, Brian C Nelson et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2009

  • Mental State Attribution to Robots

    Open Access•Sam Thellman, Maartje M A de Graaf et al.•ACM Transactions on Human-Robot…•2022

  • Why didn't you tag me

    Open Access•Christiane M Büttner, Selma Carolin Rudert•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • I, Robot

    Open Access•Barbara C N Müller, Xin Gao et al.•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • A Study on Social Inclusion of Humanoid Robots

    Open Access•Cecilia Roselli, Serena Marchesi et al.•International Journal of Social…•2024

  • Should I Blame the Human or the Robot? Attribution Within a Human–Robot Group

    Open Access•Xin Lei, Pei‐Luen Patrick Rau et al.•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions

    Open Access•Francesco Ferrari, Maria-Paola Paladino et al.•International Journal of Social…•2016

  • Self-disclosure and liking

    Nancy L Collins, Lynn C Miller•Psychological Bulletin•1994

  • Social cues establish expectations of rejection and affect the response to being rejected

    Open Access•James H Wirth, Michael J Bernstein et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2015

  • It will (never) stop hurting

    Open Access•Christiane M Büttner, Melissa Jauch et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2023

  • Lonely hearts and angry minds

    Open Access•Luca Andrighetto, Paolo Riva et al.•Aggressive Behavior•2019

  • Upright and left out

    Open Access•Keith M Welker, David E Oberleitner et al.•European Journal of Social…•2013

  • When ostracism leads to aggression

    Open Access•Wayne Warburton, Wayne A Warburton et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2005

  • How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence

    Open Access•Lisa Zadro, Kimberly D Williams et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2004

  • Excluded emotions

    Open Access•Rosalind M Chow, Larissa Z Tiedens et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2007

  • Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction

    Open Access•Iolanda Leite, Carlos Martinho et al.•International Journal of Social…•2013

  • Mind Perception in HRI

    Open Access•Ilenia Cucciniello, Sara Sangiovanni et al.•International Journal of Social…•2023

  • Cyberostracism

    Kimberly D Williams, Kipling D Williams et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • Intimacy as an interpersonal process

    Jean‐philippe Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe Laurenceau et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others

    Andrea E Abele, Andrea E Abele-Brehm et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2007

  • Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness

    Arthur Aron, Elaine N Aron et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1992

  • Effects of self-disclosure role on liking, closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions

    Open Access•Sprecher, Susan Sprecher et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2013

  • Chronic social exclusion and evidence for the resignation stage

    Open Access•Paolo Riva, Lorenzo Montali et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2017

  • Exclude Me If You Can

    Open Access•Michaela Pfundmair, Nilüfer Aydin et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2015

  • Excluded From All Humanity

    Open Access•Luca Andrighetto, Paolo Riva et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2016

  • Feeling Thermometers Versus 7-Point Scales

    Open Access•Duane F Alwin•Sociological Methods & Research•1997

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae