Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kazakhstan’s Geoeconomic Hedging

Navigating the BRI and the Global Gateway for EU-China Connectivity

Bibliographic Data

ID17812646
AuthorsTiago Botelho dos Santos (0000-0001-5539-1238, University of Macau, corresponding author), Diogo Borges (0000-0001-9914-9048, University of Macau)
Year2026
Volume17
Issue2
Pages410-420
Publication date2026-04-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Eurasian Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1879-3665 • E-ISSN: 1879-3673
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/18793665261447301
OpenAlexW7160135882
LanguageEN
References cited22

This article examines how Kazakhstan strategically navigates the complex and evolving landscape of EU-China connectivity, with a specific focus on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Global Gateway (GG). Drawing on the theoretical framework of geoeconomic hedging, the paper argues that Kazakhstan’s strategic adaptability enables it to maximise national benefits while mitigating risks associated with an increasingly competitive Eurasian environment. Through a detailed empirical analysis, the paper identifies key infrastructure projects and investments from both the BRI and the GG that converge on Kazakh territory. It demonstrates that Kazakhstan actively leverages its geographical position and its multi-vector foreign policy to engage with both initiatives. Ultimately, it concludes that Kazakhstan effectively mediates and facilitates EU-China connectivity, serving as a critical interregional connector. This unique role allows Kazakhstan to convene the interests of Beijing and Brussels, offering a compelling case study for the future of Eurasian trade and transport architecture

Adaptability · Beijing · China · Gateway (web page) · Kazakh · Key (lock) · Position (finance) · Belt and Road Initiative · Border Security and International Relations · Global Energy Security and Policy

  • War by Other Means

    Robert D Blackwill, Jennifer M Harris et al.•War by Other Means•2016

  • Middle Powers in International Politics

    Open Access•Carsten Holbraad•Middle Powers in International…•1984

  • Getting hedging right

    Open Access•Cheng‐chwee Kuik•China International Strategy Review•2021

  • The Belt and Road Initiative

    Michael Clarke•Asia policy•2017

  • China's Silk Road and Kazakhstan's Bright Path

    Nargis Kassenova•Asia policy•2017

  • The European Union's Global Gateway

    Open Access•Simone Tagliapietra•World Economy•2024

  • A critical look at Chinese ‘debt-trap diplomacy’

    Deborah Brautigam•Area Development and Policy•2019

  • Strategic Hedging and Changes in Geopolitical Capabilities for Second-Tier States

    Open Access•Nikolas Vander Vennet, Mohammad Salman•Chinese Political Science Review•2018

  • Hedging in international relations

    Open Access•John D Ciorciari, Jürgen Haacke•International Relations of the…•2019

  • Understanding foreign policy strategies of Kazakhstan

    Maxat Kassen•Cambridge Review of International…•2018

  • The defense strategies of middle powers

    Open Access•Håkan Edström, Jacob Westberg•Comparative Strategy•2020

  • The Essence of Hedging

    Kuik Cheng-Chwee•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2008

  • The EU and Kazakhstan in the Latest Geopolitical and Geoeconomic Conditions

    Open Access•Mariya Muratova, Houman A Sadri et al.•Journal of Eurasian Studies•2023

  • Reassessing Hedging

    Darren J Lim, Zack Cooper•Security Studies•2015

  • Rethinking strategy and statecraft for the twenty-first century of complexity

    Open Access•Jochen Prantl, Evelyn Goh•International Affairs•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae