Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Queering the Odds

The Case Against “Family Balancing”

Bibliographic Data

ID17814149
AuthorsTereza Hendl (0000-0002-6472-7028, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume10
Issue2
Pages4-30
Publication date2017-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1937-4577 • E-ISSN: 1937-4585
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/ijfab.10.2.4
OpenAlexW2763269480
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited31

In this paper, I investigate the ethical aspects of sex selection for “family balancing.” Advocates of the practice make two claims: first, that it is ethically permissible because it creates gender diversity and entails no harm from sexism; and, second, that it benefits families, as gender diversity offers richer experiences. I test these claims through an empirical study with Australian sex selectors. I argue that the claims are flawed because they are grounded in a narrow understanding of sexism that disregards gender essentialism. As family balancing is based on the selection of children to fit preconceived binary gender roles, it denies diversity and reinforces sexism

Business · Empirical research · Epistemology · Essentialism · Gender diversity · Harm · Logistic regression · Odds · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender Studies · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology

  • A Systematic Review of Current Literature on Gender Disappointment

    Open Access•Brittany Stahnke, Morgan E Cooley•The Family Journal•2025

  • Procreative Beneficence

    Open Access•Julian Savulescu•Bioethics•2001

  • The Five Sexes

    Open Access•A Fausto-Sterling, Anne Fausto‐sterling•The Sciences•1993

  • Constructing Masculinity

    Open Access•Richard Brent Turner•Black Routes to Islam•2009

  • The Argument for Unlimited Procreative Liberty

    Maura A Ryan•The Hastings Center Report•1990

  • Selective Termination of Pregnancy and Women's Reproductive Autonomy

    Christine Overall•The Hastings Center Report•1990

  • Gender

    Open Access•Jennifer Germon•Gender•2009

  • Gender Trouble

    Judith Butler•Gender Trouble•2011

  • Limits of state intervention in sex-selective abortion

    Jing‐Bao Nie, Jing-Bao Nie•Culture Health & Sexuality•2010

  • Do Boys Have to Be Boys? Gender, Narrativity, and the John/Joan Case

    Bernice L Hausman•NWSA Journal•2000

  • Before You Formed in the Womb I Knew You”

    Open Access•Anna Mudde•Hypatia•2010

  • Defeating Bigenderism

    Open Access•Miqqi Alicia Gilbert•Hypatia•2008

  • Genetic Maps and Human Imaginations

    Kelly, Susan E Kelly et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2001

  • Sexing the body

    Anne Fausto-Sterling•Sexing the body•2000

  • Justice in the Context of Family Balancing

    Open Access•Michelle L Mcgowan, Richard R Sharp•Science Technology & Human Values•2013

  • There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons

    Open Access•Sunita Puri, Vincanne Adams et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • Feminist perspectives in medical ethics

    Open Access•Sonya R Hardin•Social Science & Medicine•1993

  • How Many More Missing Women? Excess Female Mortality and Prenatal Sex Selection, 1970-2050

    Open Access•John Bongaarts, Christophe Z Guilmoto•Population and Development Review•2015

  • Performative Acts and Gender Constitution

    Judith Butler•Theatre Journal•1988

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae