Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The role of the reproductive technology clinic in the imposition of societal values

Bibliographic Data

ID17814227
AuthorsTeresa M Segal (corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume3
Issue2
Pages90-108
Publication date2010-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1937-4577 • E-ISSN: 1937-4585
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/ijfab.3.2.90
OpenAlexW2081001318
LanguageEN
References cited1

IVF/PGS procedures require that all embryos produced for potential implantation be screened for genetic abnormalities: only embryos free of genetic defects may be implanted or cryogenically preserved for future implantation. In this paper, I argue that the standard practice of the reproductive technology clinic (RTC), according to which all abnormal embryos must be discarded, unjustly imposes certain biases and discriminatory social values upon persons for whom it may not be a significant concern that their offspring would be disabled. The “standard” practice both reflects a bias against disability and imposes this bias upon those who seek reproductive assistance from RTCs. I argue, therefore, that insofar as consenting to the destruction of any abnormal embryos as a condition of IVF treatment, RTCs threaten the autonomy of women (or parents) seeking medical assistance to overcome infertility. Finally, I examine recent empirical findings which suggest that genetic screening and destruction of abnormal embryos does not actually aid the overall objective of IVF, which is live birth, and may actually hinder it

Assisted reproductive technology · Autonomy · Biology · Cryopreservation · Embryo · Environmental health · Fertility · Genetic diagnosis · Gynecology · Infertility · Offspring · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Reproductive technology · Social acceptance · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Law · Medicine · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology · Genetics

  • The Future of Human Reproduction

    Open Access•Vanaja Dhruvarajan, Christine Overall•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1992

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae