Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Feminist bioethics meets experimental philosophy

Embracing the qualitative and experiential

Dados Bibliográficos

ID17814489
AutoresCatherine A Womack (autor correspondente), Norah Mulvaney-Day (0000-0003-2905-6983)
Ano2012
Volume5
Fascículo1
Páginas113-132
Data de publicação2012-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1937-4577 • E-ISSN: 1937-4585
EditoraUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/ijfab.5.1.113
OpenAlexW2002361722
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas21

Experimental philosophers advocate expansion of philosophical methods to include empirical investigation into the concepts used by ordinary people in reasoning and action. We propose also including methods of qualitative social science, which we argue serve both moral and epistemic goals. Philosophical analytical tools applied to interdisciplinary research designs can provide ways to extract rich contextual information from subjects. We argue that this approach has important implications for bioethics; it provides both epistemic and moral reasons to use the experiences and perspectives of diverse populations to better identify underlying concepts as well as to develop effective interventions within particular communities

Bioethics · Empirical research · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Experiential knowledge · Experiential learning · Pedagogy · Political science · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Ethics in medical practice · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Qualitative methods show that surveys misrepresent “ought implies can” judgments

    Kyle Thompson•Philosophical Psychology•2023

  • What is it like to be colour‐blind? A case study in experimental philosophy of experience

    Open Access•Keith Allen, Patrick T Quinlan et al.•Mind & Language•2022

  • Fatphobia in sacrificial moral decision-making dilemmas

    Maria Campo-Redondo, Laura Gamboa et al.•Fat Studies•2025

  • What Knowledge Is and What It Ought to Be

    Sally Haslanger•Resisting Reality•2012

  • Evidence-based Policy

    Ray Pawson•Evidence-based Policy•2006

  • The Science of Improvement

    Donald M Berwick•JAMA•2008

  • The Trolley Problem

    Judith Jarvis Thomson•The Yale Law Journal•1985

  • Case Study Research

    Jean Hartley•Essential Guide to Qualitative…•2004

  • Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology

    Elizabeth Anderson•Philosophical Topics•1995

  • The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman, L Young et al.•Psychological Science•2006

  • Science as Social Knowledge

    Helen E Longino•Science As Social Knowledge•2020

  • Abstract + Concrete = Paradox

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong•Experimental Philosophy•2008

  • Feminism in ethics

    Open Access•Marilyn Friedman•Cambridge Companion to Feminism…•2000

  • The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy

    Open Access•Sabina Lovibond, Jame et al.•Cambridge Companion to Feminism…•2000

  • Evidence‐based policy

    Open Access•Nancy Cartwright, Andrew Goldfinch et al.•Journal of Children s Services•2009

  • Ask Me No Secrets, I'll Tell You No Lies

    Open Access•Sarah Flicker•Qualitative Report•2015

  • Advancing the Science of Community-Level Interventions

    Edison J Trickett, Sarah Beehler et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2011

  • What Are We Talking About? The Semantics and Politics of Social Kinds

    Open Access•Sally Haslanger•Hypatia•2005

  • The Fate of Knowledge

    Helen E Longino•Fate of Knowledge•2002

  • Interpersonal Issues in Expressing Lay Knowledge

    Open Access•Bregje De Kok, Sue Widdicombe•Journal of Health Psychology•2010

  • Knowing Tornadoes and Other Things

    Cora Diamond•New Literary History•1991

  • Cases and Biographies

    Carol A Heimer•Annual Review of Sociology•2001

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,75
Intervalo de citações2022 - 2025 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae