Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Role of Grammarly in Saudi EFL Writing

Students’ Perceptions of Its Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Overreliance

Bibliographic Data

ID17818541
AuthorsAhmed Mohammed Ahmed Abdullah Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Abdullah (Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-03-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFWU Journal of Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1995-1272
PublisherShaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar, Pakistan (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.51709/19951272/spring2026/10
OpenAlexW7154262873
LanguageEN
References cited32

The rapid adoption of AI writing assistants such as Grammarly in education has influenced how English language learners approach writing tasks.By providing automated feedback on linguistic errors, including mechanics (spelling, punctuation, and capitalization), grammar, and style, these tools may help learners improve writing accuracy, reduce cognitive load, and write more efficiently.However, excessive reliance on such tools is a cause for concern.This study investigated Saudi male preparatory-year EFL students' perceptions of Grammarly at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University (n = 61).A validated questionnaire was used in a cross-sectional design to collect data on perceived effectiveness in correcting writing mechanics (spelling, capitalization, and punctuation), perceived efficiency, limitations, and overreliance.The findings indicated that most students perceived Grammarly as useful in correcting writing mechanics, particularly spelling (85.2%), capitalization (78.7%), and punctuation (68.9%).In addition, 68.8% of students agreed that Grammarly saved time and effort.Responses regarding overreliance were mixed: 37.7% indicated high overreliance on Grammarly, whereas 62.3% reported low/no overreliance.Spearman's rho showed no significant association between perceived usefulness and overreliance ( = .105,p = .419).These findings suggest that Grammarly can be integrated into EFL writing instruction as a scaffold to support writing mechanics, provided that its use is guided in ways that also promote critical engagement and learner autonomy

Capitalization · Cognition · English language · Perception · Punctuation · Spelling · Writing assessment · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Writing and Handwriting Education

  • Exploring pedagogical perspectives of EFL instructors

    Open Access•Saleem Mohd Nasim, Syeda Mujeeba et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2024

  • The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development

    Open Access•Aniella Mihaela Vieriu, Gabriel Petrea•Education Sciences•2025

  • Investigating EFL Students’ Writing Problems Through the Lens of Grammarly

    Open Access•Rattana Yawiloeng•Theory and Practice in Language…•2025

  • Investigating EFL Students' Writing Skills Through Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Fawaz Al Mahmud•Journal of Language Teaching and…•2023

  • Metacognitive Listening Comprehension Strategies of Arab English Language Learners

    Open Access•Saleem Mohd Nasim, Enrique Palou•Education Research International•2022

  • Learning Styles of Saudi ESP Students

    Open Access•Saleem Mohd Nasim, Syeda Mujeeba•Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplina…•2021

  • Arab EFL Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of Errors in Mechanics in Second Language Paragraph Writing

    Open Access•Saleem Mohd Nasim, Saleem Mohd Nasim Saleem Mohd Nasim et al.•FWU Journal of Social Sciences•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae