The Role of Grammarly in Saudi EFL Writing
Students’ Perceptions of Its Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Overreliance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17818541 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Abdullah Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Abdullah (Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | FWU Journal of Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1995-1272 |
| Publisher | Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar, Pakistan (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.51709/19951272/spring2026/10 |
| OpenAlex | W7154262873 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 32 |
The rapid adoption of AI writing assistants such as Grammarly in education has influenced how English language learners approach writing tasks.By providing automated feedback on linguistic errors, including mechanics (spelling, punctuation, and capitalization), grammar, and style, these tools may help learners improve writing accuracy, reduce cognitive load, and write more efficiently.However, excessive reliance on such tools is a cause for concern.This study investigated Saudi male preparatory-year EFL students' perceptions of Grammarly at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University (n = 61).A validated questionnaire was used in a cross-sectional design to collect data on perceived effectiveness in correcting writing mechanics (spelling, capitalization, and punctuation), perceived efficiency, limitations, and overreliance.The findings indicated that most students perceived Grammarly as useful in correcting writing mechanics, particularly spelling (85.2%), capitalization (78.7%), and punctuation (68.9%).In addition, 68.8% of students agreed that Grammarly saved time and effort.Responses regarding overreliance were mixed: 37.7% indicated high overreliance on Grammarly, whereas 62.3% reported low/no overreliance.Spearman's rho showed no significant association between perceived usefulness and overreliance ( = .105,p = .419).These findings suggest that Grammarly can be integrated into EFL writing instruction as a scaffold to support writing mechanics, provided that its use is guided in ways that also promote critical engagement and learner autonomy
Capitalization · Cognition · English language · Perception · Punctuation · Spelling · Writing assessment · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Writing and Handwriting Education
Exploring pedagogical perspectives of EFL instructors
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development
Investigating EFL Students’ Writing Problems Through the Lens of Grammarly
Investigating EFL Students' Writing Skills Through Artificial Intelligence
Metacognitive Listening Comprehension Strategies of Arab English Language Learners
Learning Styles of Saudi ESP Students
Arab EFL Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of Errors in Mechanics in Second Language Paragraph Writing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |