U.S. preservation nonprofits in the 2010s
Shifting professional approaches, representation and identities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17819158 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anne‐lise K Velez (0000-0002-9396-7063, Virginia Tech, corresponding author), Joseph Daniel (0000-0002-6145-4060, Virginia Tech), McKenna Magoffin (Virginia Tech) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2044-1266 • E-ISSN: 2044-1274 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jchmsd-11-2023-0184 |
| OpenAlex | W4404633777 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
Purpose We assess changes that have taken place in organizational structure, governance structure and professional approach to U.S. nonprofit preservation from 2010 to 2020. This research contributes to our understanding of pressures shaping organizational capacity of cultural and historic preservation nonprofits in the U.S., focusing on changes in ecological influences at the national and regional level through the lenses of institutional theory and regionalism. Design/methodology/approach Data for this study are from an online survey of 75 cultural and historic preservation nonprofit organizations in the United States. The survey was developed based on previous interview research, and respondents were asked scaled and open-ended questions regarding the scope of their work and organizational capacity. Findings These data show resource preservation has shifted focus somewhat from individual, private sites to commercial or public buildings and districts. We also noted changes in professional approaches to preservation around engagement in disaster planning and the emergence of social justice as a focus area. Collectively, changes in preservation have implications for representation, public understanding of history and regional identities across the U.S., as well as for the way we understand changes in subfields or like groups of organizations within a larger population of organizations. Originality/value This study builds on previous research on the scope and capacity within the U.S. nonprofit cultural and historic preservation, including demonstrating a growing focus on social justice issues within the subsector. It contributes to institutional research on changes in subfields resulting from changes in external pressures and in culture. There are clear practical implications for practitioners seeking to understand the capacities and values in other organizations undertaking similar work. As preservation and cultural understanding of what is worth preserving and promoting changes, society can benefit by understanding current practitioner approaches and encouraging community–practitioner interactions
Corporate governance · Economics · Management · Originality · Political science · Population · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Public Administration · Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Fields, Institutional Infrastructure and Governance
Field or Fields? Building the Scaffolding for Cumulation of Research on Institutional Fields
New Practice Creation
The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses
Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields
The Role of Context in Qualitative Case Study Research
The Contribution of National Income Inequality to Regional Economic Divergence
The sociocultural impact of adaptive reuse of immovable cultural heritage from the perspective of direct users and the local community
Stakeholder preference mapping
Energy and historic buildings
Applying social impact assessment (SIA) principles in assessing contribution of cultural heritage to social sustainability in rural landscapes
Industrial heritage
Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research
Place, Time, and Philanthropy
Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies
Performance as place preservation
Perspectives on social justice among US historic preservation practitioners
Does intra-disciplinary historic preservation scholarship address the exigent issues of practice? Exploring the character and impact of preservation knowledge production in relation to critical heritage studies, equity, and social justice
Evaluating and Rethinking the Case Study
Heritage, Human Rights, and Social Justice
Institutionalized Organizations
Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations
An Indicator Framework for Linking Historic Preservation and Community Economic Development
| Highly cited | No |
|---|