Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Frankenstein

Children, Duties, and the (In)Justice of Rights

Bibliographic Data

ID17820160
AuthorsEnit Karafili Steiner (0009-0005-6880-5547, University of Lausanne, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume15
Issue4
Pages55-55
Publication date2026-04-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2076-0787 • E-ISSN: 2076-0787
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/h15040055
OpenAlexW7151224518
LanguageEN
References cited32

This essay explores Mary Shelley’s contribution to the political philosophy of children’s rights and its connection to duties-based justice by establishing a dialogue between Frankenstein and The Rights of Infants (1797). A little-studied treatise by Thomas Spence, Rights of Infants advances a proto-feminist stance that is not unlike Godwin’s and Wollstonecraft’s model in that it foregrounds duties from which rights can be extrapolated. Two points made by Spence inform this reading of Frankenstein. First, Spence’s text spotlights a neglected line of thought during the French Revolution, which, contrary to social contract theory, posits the child as the paradigmatic recipient of justice and familial life as the cornerstone for deliberations on justice. Second, Spence identified acts of conquest camouflaged as a fabled, non-existent consent between people and government by social contract theorists like Hobbes and Locke. Shelley’s novel dramatizes these two points by taking infancy as the ground zero on which to think of justice, and then, incrementally exposing a logic of conquest through the concatenated deaths of William and Justine and the destruction of the inanimate female creature. The essay concludes that the novel stages a far-reaching interrogation of rights-based justice, thus extending a view of justice that has gained prominence in critiques of neoliberalism over the last half-century

CONQUEST · Cornerstone · Economic Justice · Human rights · Interrogation · Political philosophy · Politics · Gothic Literature and Media Analysis · Literature: history, themes, analysis · Science Education and Perceptions

  • The Endurance of Frankenstein

    George Levine, U C Knoepflmacher•Endurance of Frankenstein•1979

  • Theft Is Property!

    Open Access•Robert Nichols•Theft is property!•2019

  • Leaky Bodies and Boundaries. Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)ethics

    Open Access•Christopher Dowrick•BMJ•1997

  • An essay on the principle of population; or, a view of its past and present effects on human happiness; with an inquiry into our prospects respecting the future removal or mitigation of the evils whic

    Open Access•Thomas Robert Malthus•An essay on the principle of…•1826

  • Born This Way

    Martha Stoddard Holmes•Literature and medicine•2018

  • If the World Is a Family, What Kind of Family Is It

    Open Access•Susan Marks•European Journal of International…•2025

  • Nothing More Unnatural

    James O’Rourke, James O'Rourke•ELH•1989

  • Frankenstein, racial science, and the yellow peril

    Anne K Mellor•Nineteenth Century Contexts•2001

  • Simone Weil on the Injustice of Rights-Based Doctrines

    Open Access•Edward Andrews, Edward Andrew•The Review of Politics•1986

  • A Troubled Legacy

    Diana Reese, Diana K Reese•Representations•2006

  • Hercules and the Radical Image in the French Revolution

    Lynn Hunt•Representations•1983

  • Frankenstein's Monster and Images of Race in Nineteenth-Century Britain

    H L Malchow•Past & Present•1993

  • Secrets and Narrative Sequence

    Frank Kermode•Critical Inquiry•1980

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae