Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Echoes of Emotion

Influencers’ Communication Strategies and Comment Polarization in the US 2024 Presidential Election

Bibliographic Data

ID17823254
AuthorsXianquan Zeng (corresponding author), Jiarun Du, Jinghong Xu (0000-0003-4654-0603), Qiong Xu (0000-0002-0103-8081)
Year2026
Volume14
Publication date2026-04-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedia and Communication (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2183-2439 • E-ISSN: 2183-2439
PublisherCogitatio (PUBLISHER • PT)
DOI10.17645/mac.11794
OpenAlexW7159970525
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited56

This study examines strategic differences between Democratic and Republican YouTube influencers during the 2024 US presidential election and their association with comment-level political polarization. Drawing on digital opinion leadership theory, platform architecture perspectives, and visual framing research, we employ a mixed-methods design integrating framing analysis with latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling. The study analyzes 373 videos and 371,124 comments posted by 40 YouTube influencers (≥100,000 subscribers) from July 27th to November 30th, 2024. Findings reveal that Democratic creators adopted a moral-crisis framing strategy while Republicans emphasized an opportunity–explanation framing model, and that 56.4% of comment discourse centers on candidate personality rather than policy substance, exhibiting patterns consistent with affective polarization. The study develops and empirically calibrates the YouTube polarization risk assessment scale through ordinary least squares regression analysis ( R 2 = 0.224, p < 0.001), identifying political stance strength and humor/sarcasm as the strongest predictors of comment polarization, thereby providing an exploratory, empirically informed framework for assessing polarization risk in platform-based political communication

Democracy · General election · Influencer marketing · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Humor Studies and Applications · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

  • Strategic Continuity and Evolving Toolkit

    Open Access•Viorela Dan, Uta Rußmann et al.•Media and Communication•2026

  • Affective Publics

    Zizi Papacharissi•Affective publics•2014

  • The Revolution That Wasn’t

    Jen Schradie•Revolution That Wasn't•2019

  • The Platform Society

    José Van Dijck, Thomas Poell et al.•Platform Society•2018

  • Custodians of the Internet

    Tarleton Gillespie•Custodians of the Internet•2019

  • False equivalencies

    Open Access•Deen Freelon, Arthur Marwick et al.•Science•2020

  • Finding scientific topics

    Open Access•Thomas L Griffiths, Mark Steyvers•Proceedings of the National…•2004

  • The levels of visual framing

    Lulu Rodríguez, Daniela V Dimitrova•Journal of Visual Literacy•2011

  • The Affordances of Social Media Platforms

    Taina Bucher, Anne Helmond•The Sage Handbook of Social Media•2018

  • Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization

    Open Access•Jennifer C Cole, Ash Gillis et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2025

  • Political Influencers on YouTube

    Open Access•Tasja-Selina Fischer, Castulus Kolo et al.•Media and Communication•2022

  • The Cultural Logic of Photo-Based Meme Genres

    Open Access•Limor Shifman•Journal of Visual Culture•2014

  • Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments

    Open Access•Kevin Coe, Kate Kenski et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Framing European politics

    Open Access•Holli A Semetko, Patti M Valkenburg et al.•Journal of Communication•2000

  • Politics on YouTube

    Open Access•Raghvendra Mall, Mridul Nagpal et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Understanding Political Polarization Based on User Activity

    Open Access•Giang T C Tran, Luong Vuong Nguyen et al.•SAGE Open•2022

  • Political Influencers and Their Social Media Audiences during the 2021 Arizona Audit

    Open Access•Kyle Rose, Deana A Rohlinger•Socius Sociological Research for…•2024

  • Who Shares and Comments on News

    Open Access•Antonis Kalogeropoulos, Samuel Negredo et al.•Social Media + Society•2017

  • Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research

    Daniel Maier, Annie Waldherr et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2018

  • News Frame Analysis

    Dror Walter, Yotam Ophir•Communication Methods and Measures•2019

  • Topic modeling for frame analysis

    Open Access•Tuukka Ylä-Anttila, Veikko Eranti et al.•Global Media and Communication•2021

  • How to Analyze Social Media? Assessing the Promise of Mixed-Methods Designs for Studying the Twitter Feeds of PMSCs

    Open Access•Andrea Schneiker, Magnus Dau et al.•International Studies Perspectives•2018

  • Revisiting opinion leadership in the digital realm

    Open Access•Darian Harff, Paula Stehr et al.•New Media & Society•2025

  • Polarized platforms? How partisanship shapes perceptions of “algorithmic news bias”

    Open Access•Mikhaila N Calice, Luye Bao et al.•New Media & Society•2021

  • Identity concerns drive belief

    Open Access•Andrea Pereira, Elizabeth Harris et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021

  • Media prosumers in political communication

    Open Access•Salome Berrocal-Gonzalo, Eva Campos Domínguez et al.•Comunicar•2014

  • News Recommendations from Social Media Opinion Leaders

    Open Access•Jason Turcotte, Chance York et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2015

  • Explicating Affordances

    Open Access•Sandra K Evans, K E Pearce et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2016

  • Putting the Image Back Into the Frame

    Open Access•Stephanie Geise, Christian Baden•Communication Theory•2014

  • The Law of Group Polarization

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein•Journal of Political Philosophy•2002

  • Gender-Related Differences in Online Comment Sections

    Open Access•Constanze Küchler, Anke Stoll et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2022

  • Integrative Framing Analysis

    Open Access•Viorela Dan•Integrative Framing Analysis•2017

  • Image Bite Politics

    Maria Elizabeth Grabe, Erik Page Bucy•Image bite politics•2009

  • Communicating Climate Change

    Matthew C Nisbet•Environment Science and Policy…•2009

  • (Un)Funny Against All Odds

    Open Access•Daniel Beck, Alexander Spencer•Alternatives Global Local Political•2024

  • (Mis)estimating Affective Polarization

    James N Druckman, Samara Klar et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Computational Identification of Media Frames

    Tom Nicholls, P D Culpepper•Political Communication•2021

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Dynamics of Polarization

    Open Access•Daniel Diermeier, Christopher Li•British Journal of Political…•2023

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Framing

    Open Access•Robert M Entman•Journal of Communication•1993

  • Political Influencers on Social Media

    Open Access•Martin J Riedl, Josephine Lukito et al.•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Evaluating Sampling Methods for Content Analysis of Twitter Data

    Open Access•Hwalbin Kim, M Jones-Jang et al.•Social Media + Society•2018

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae