Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“One Difficulty…of a Serious Nature”

The Overlooked Racial Dynamics of the Electoral College

Bibliographic Data

ID17823409
AuthorsWilliam D Blake (0000-0002-0538-6104, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume17
Issue2
Pages315-343
Publication date2019-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Forum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2194-6183 • E-ISSN: 1540-8884
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/for-2019-0019
OpenAlexW2973232913
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited36

This paper explores the racial origins and legacy of the Electoral College through historical and quantitative analyses. At the Constitutional Convention, the Electoral College served the interests of Southern slaveowners by perpetuating the advantage of the Three-Fifths Compromise. Following Reconstruction, Southern states that disenfranchised African Americans received an even larger voice in the Electoral College. Republicans tried to counter these moves by admitting unusually small states into the union. The ironic consequence of this non-racial decision is that, today, these states are heavily White and have citizens with higher levels of racial resentment. A MM-regression analysis of every election from 2000 on indicates the Electoral College has consistently awarded more votes per capita to states with Whiter populations and more racially conservative attitudes. The racially-disparate power exerted by these states makes it more difficult to enact racially-egalitarian policies. This paper adds a new perspective to the normative debate over the Electoral College, which typically focuses on democratic fairness and federalism concerns

Compromise · Democracy · Federalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Resentment · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Public Administration · Race, History, and American Society

  • One Person, How Many Votes? Demographic Distortions in United States Elections

    Open Access•Lee Kennedy-Shaffer•Statistics and Public Policy•2026

  • Entangled in the Chemical Industry

    Open Access•Daniel Morales‐doyle, Tomasz G Rajski•Science & Education•2026

  • The Two Reconstructions

    Richard M Valelly, Richard Valelly•Two Reconstructions•2004

  • Congressional Influence and Patterns of New Deal Spending, 1933-1939

    Gary M Anderson, Robert D Tollison•The Journal of Law and Economics•1991

  • The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787

    Max Farrand•Harvard Law Review•1911

  • Shifting the Color Line

    Robert C Lieberman•Shifting the Color Line•2001

  • The Politics of Resentment

    Katherine J Cramer•Politics of Resentment•2015

  • Stacking the Senate, Changing the Nation

    Open Access•Charles Stewart, Barry R Weingast•Studies in American Political…•1992

  • Between Reconstructions

    Open Access•J A Jenkins, Justin Peck et al.•Studies in American Political…•2010

  • The Race to 270

    Open Access•Terri Susan Fine•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America

    Open Access•G Terry Madonna•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2005

  • The Louisiana Purchase and South Carolina's Reopening of the Slave Trade in 1803

    Jed Handelsman Shugerman•Journal of the Early Republic•2002

  • The Five-Fifths Rule and the Unconstitutional Presidential Election of 1916

    Michael L Rosin•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2013

  • What Role Does the "Federalism Bonus" Play in Presidential Selection

    R E Adkins, K A Kirwan•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2002

  • Thinking About the Political Impacts of the Electoral College

    Open Access•B Grofman, L Feld et al.•Public Choice•2005

  • Paths to victory in presidential elections

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, D Marc Kilgour•Public Choice•2017

  • Pivotal states in the Electoral College, 1880 to 2004

    Open Access•John Wright, John R Wright•Public Choice•2009

  • Voting on slavery at the Constitutional Convention

    Open Access•Keith L Dougherty, Jac C Heckelman•Public Choice•2008

  • Why noncompetitive states are so important for understanding the outcomes of competitive elections

    Open Access•Jonathan R Cervas, B Grofman•Public Choice•2017

  • Republican Reconstruction and Section Two of the Fourteenth Amendment

    Open Access•George P Smith•The Western Political Quarterly•1970

  • The Electoral College at Philadelphia

    Shlomo Slonim•Journal of American History•1986

  • The Federal Elections Bill of 1890

    Richard E Welch•Journal of American History•1965

  • The Price of Admission

    Eric Biber•American Journal of Legal History•2004

  • The Power of the States in U.S. Presidential Elections

    Open Access•George Rabinowitz, Stuart Elaine Macdonald•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Partisan Bias in the Electoral College

    Michael Nelson, Michael C Nelson•The Journal of Politics•1974

  • Estimating Partisan Bias of the Electoral College Under Proposed Changes in Elector Apportionment

    Amy Thomas, Andrew Gelman et al.•Statistics Politics and Policy•2012

  • The Founding Fathers

    Open Access•John P Roche•American Political Science Review•1961

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae