Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for caregivers of children with chronic conditions

A mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) of efficacy, process, and acceptance

Datos Bibliográficos

ID17823784
AutoresS WRIGHT (0000-0003-4339-7813, Queen's University Belfast, autor de correspondencia), Christopher D Graham (0000-0001-8456-9154, Queen's University Belfast), Rebecca Houghton (0000-0002-2590-7907, Northern Health and Social Care Trust), Cara Ghiglieri (0000-0002-6671-7341, Queen's University Belfast), Emma Berry (0000-0003-3802-7375, Queen's University Belfast, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen27
Páginas72-97
Fecha de publicación2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Contextual Behavioral Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2212-1447 • E-ISSN: 2212-1455
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.12.003
OpenAlexW4313559486
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas19

Caregivers of children with chronic conditions face enormous challenges and often poor mental health. ACT may facilitate psychological adjustment for this population. This MMSR therefore aimed to examine the efficacy and acceptability of ACT for caregivers of children (diagnosed aged <18) with long-term conditions. PsychInfo, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched. Studies were included that mentioned ACT as the intervention under study in the manuscript and referenced an existing ACT protocol or stated that the applied intervention was guided by core processes of ACT. Both individual and group ACT interventions were eligible for inclusion. Studies were excluded if they applied ACT to other populations, adopted an inappropriate research methodology (e.g., case study), or didn't publish in English in a peer reviewed journal. A total of 19 eligible studies were returned from searches based on these criteria. However, despite both individual and group ACT interventions being eligible for inclusion, none of the 19 studies delivered ACT individually. Meta-analysis revealed significant effects of group ACT interventions on parental mood at post-intervention (SMD = −0.43, P = 0.001), follow-up (SMD = −0.65, P = 0), and both time points combined (SMD = −0.52, P = 0). Group ACT interventions also had significant effects on parenting confidence at both time-points combined (SMD = 0.34, P = 0.018), and on cognitive fusion at follow-up (SMD = −6.12, P = 0.016). Further, significant effects of the intervention on psychological flexibility were revealed at post-intervention (SMD = −2.92, P = 0.007), follow-up (SMD = 5.19, P = 0), and both time points combined (SMD = −3.89, P = 0). Narrative synthesis then suggested positive impacts of group ACT interventions on mood, general wellbeing, and all ACT processes. Finally, qualitative findings indicated that group ACT interventions facilitated a sense of all being in the same boat which allowed parents to open-up. Mindfulness exercises and peer interaction were identified as particularly helpful aspects of the intervention. ACT was therefore shown to be effective and acceptable in improving the health of caregivers. Future research evaluating ACT interventions delivered in non-group-based is now required

Acceptance and commitment therapy · MEDLINE · Meta-analysis · Mood · Population · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Family and Disability Support Research · Medicine · Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions · Psychology · Internal Medicine