Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Ethnography to Webnography

Changing Contours of Field Research in India1An earlier version of the paper was presented in the M. N. Srinivas Centenary Conference, organised by the Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru on 29–30 August 2017. Several of the issues raised in this paper are to be traced to the very insightful discussions with the doctoral students at Isec in the classrooms or outside it. In particular, I should like to make a mention of V. Gayathri, Sathyapriya Raut, Sudha Seetharaman and R. Santhosh. Thanks are due also to the past directors of Isec—G. K. Kadekodi, N. Jayaram, R. S. Deshpande and many friends working and discussions with who gave rich ideas in writing this paper: S. R. Charsley, Jim Manor, Ruedi Baumgartner, Ruedi Hogger, Christine Lutringer, Sobin George and V. Ramaswamy. The usual disclaimers apply

Bibliographic Data

ID17824899
AuthorsG K Karanth (Institute for Social and Economic Change, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume69
Issue2
Pages211-223
Publication date2020-11-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the Anthropological Survey of India (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2277-436X • E-ISSN: 2632-4369
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/2277436x20968986
OpenAlexW4248829578
LanguageEN
References cited11

Contributions of M. N. Srinivas to the understanding of changing nature of caste, village and politics have been well documented and continue to be under focus several decades after his scholarly formulations on them. This article is an attempt to focus on the nature of changes that are occurring in the realm of his contributions to the field of social science research methods—especially to the tradition of intensive field research whether in rural or urban locales. Not only have the field sites’ amenability to research has undergone a major change, the institutional context in which social research is practised have radically transformed. This article is an attempt to track some such changes in both the contexts and to reflect upon the emerging challenges to social science research in general and the idea of ‘field’ research in particular. One of the questions it raises and attempts to answer is: Is sociology and social anthropology becoming more dependent on secondary data, and the source becoming a web than the field

Caste · Epistemology · Ethnography · Field research · Political science · Politics · Realm · Social research · Social science · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · History · Law · South Asian Studies and Conflicts · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies

  • Objectivity and Insecurity

    Ryan Drake•Philosophy Today•2000

  • Looking Forward or Looking Back

    Randall Collins•American Journal of Sociology•1987

  • The Decomposition of Sociology

    Irving Louis Horowitz•The decomposition of sociology•1993

  • Sociology and World Market Society

    R Connell, R W Connell•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2000

  • Reflections on the Future of Sociology

    Andrew Abbott•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2000

  • A Survey of Research in Sociology and Social Anthropology

    R E H Ballard•Man•1974

  • Killing the Messenger

    Joel Best•Social Problems•2003

  • The Death of Sociology in the 1980s

    Norman K Denzin•American Journal of Sociology•1987

  • Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums

    Randall Collins•American Journal of Sociology•1986

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae