Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Against Constraint

Bibliographic Data

ID17826502
AuthorsLillian Wieland (0000-0003-3726-8476, corresponding author), Amanda Ruth, Daniel P Mahoney
Year2021
Volume10
Issue3
Pages48-52
Publication date2021-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDepartures in Critical Qualitative Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2333-9489 • E-ISSN: 2333-9497
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.3.48
OpenAlexW3202679043
LanguageEN

We often wonder whether the death of a loved one is “good” or “bad.” But framing a death as “good” or “bad” carries baggage from intuitions around well-being. By focusing on this dichotomy of well-being, we lose the opportunity to make meaning and instead generate burdens for those facing death. By examining various well-being theories, we claim that a well-being focus unjustly universalizes and moralizes the liminal experience of death. A meaning-making approach, on the other hand, allows suffering, life, and death to become transformational in positive ways while also promoting patient inclusion in conversations about the end of life

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Liminality · Sociology · Wonder · Ethics in medical practice · History · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae