Against Constraint
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17826502 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lillian Wieland (0000-0003-3726-8476, corresponding author), Amanda Ruth, Daniel P Mahoney |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 48-52 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Departures in Critical Qualitative Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2333-9489 • E-ISSN: 2333-9497 |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.3.48 |
| OpenAlex | W3202679043 |
| Language | EN |
We often wonder whether the death of a loved one is “good” or “bad.” But framing a death as “good” or “bad” carries baggage from intuitions around well-being. By focusing on this dichotomy of well-being, we lose the opportunity to make meaning and instead generate burdens for those facing death. By examining various well-being theories, we claim that a well-being focus unjustly universalizes and moralizes the liminal experience of death. A meaning-making approach, on the other hand, allows suffering, life, and death to become transformational in positive ways while also promoting patient inclusion in conversations about the end of life
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Liminality · Sociology · Wonder · Ethics in medical practice · History · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|