Beyond Race Scholarship as Groundbreaking/Irrelevant
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17826531 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jenna N Hanchey (0000-0002-0413-0123, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 122-125 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Departures in Critical Qualitative Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2333-9489 • E-ISSN: 2333-9497 |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/dcqr.2020.9.2.122 |
| OpenAlex | W3042251797 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
This introduction situates the 2019 National Communication Association Organizational Communication Division's Top Paper Panel walkout within a larger subdisciplinary history of erasing scholarship on racism, colonialism, as well as queer and trans* studies. I describe how such scholarship is labeled either groundbreaking or irrelevant—thereby relegating it to outside of the typical or expected domain of organizational communication
Colonialism · Intersectionality · Media studies · Political science · Queer · Racism · Scholarship · Sociology · Gender Studies · Law · Management and Organizational Studies
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |