Making a Case for General Qualitative Descriptive

Dados Bibliográficos

ID17826616
AutoresD Chase J Catalano (0000-0002-1674-4448, autor correspondente), Maria-Victoria Perez (0009-0006-8569-0486)
Ano2023
Volume12
Fascículo4
Páginas29-52
Data de publicação2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoDepartures in Critical Qualitative Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2333-9489 • E-ISSN: 2333-9497
EditoraUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/dcqr.2023.12.4.29
OpenAlexW4389989746
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas24

This research used general qualitative descriptive to explore LGBTQ+ social justice education interventions (SJEIs) facilitator experiences—commonly named safe zones—and how that role influenced their self-awareness, and perceptions of campus and campus constituents. This article signals the importance of general qualitative descriptive as a queerly robust approach to stand as its own sufficient methodology. The article focuses only on participants who facilitated LGBTQ+ SJEIs on their campus (81 of 87 participants), using social justice education pedagogy and praxis as our conceptual frameworks. Our findings highlight how the role affirms facilitators’ queer and trans identities. Additionally, our findings reveal how facilitation focused on catering to cis and heterosexual fragility and attendee desires to remain passive, not active, allies

Descriptive research · Facilitation · Facilitator · Pedagogy · Perception · Political science · Praxis · Psychological intervention · Qualitative research · Queer · Social justice · Social science · Sociology · Gender Studies · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice