Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

China and New Geopolitics of the Electricity Age

The Reconfiguration of Global Power

Bibliographic Data

ID17828012
AuthorsYu Hongyuan (corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-05-02
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChina Quarterly of International Strategic Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2377-7400 • E-ISSN: 2377-7419
PublisherWorld Scientific (PUBLISHER • SG)
DOI10.1142/s2377740026500028
OpenAlexW7160016340
LanguageEN

This article examines how the global transition from a fossil-fuel-based energy system to an electricity-centered energy order is reshaping the geopolitical structure of power. It argues that the rise of an electricity-based civilization is not merely an energy transition, but a profound transformation in the material foundations, strategic logic, and institutional forms of global politics. In contrast to the oil age in which geopolitical competition primarily revolved around the control of fuel reserves and transport routes, the electricity age is increasingly defined by competition over critical minerals, high-end power equipment, nuclear energy technology, and grid standards. Focusing on copper and lithium as strategic resources, transformers and nuclear power as key industrial capabilities, and ultra-high-voltage transmission and technical standards as instruments of structural influence, the article analyzes the emerging geography of power in the electricity era. It further compares the strategic choices of China, the United States, and the European Union, showing that China seeks to consolidate full-chain industrial advantages and enhance its rule-shaping capacity, the United States prioritizes hegemonic maintenance through supply-chain restructuring and alliance-based exclusion, and the European Union pursues a balancing strategy centered on energy sovereignty, regulatory influence, and multilateral coordination. The article contends that the geopolitics of electricity is shaped by three principal fault lines—resources, technology, and rules—while also generating new incentives for cooperation under conditions of climate vulnerability and infrastructural interdependence. It concludes that the future global electricity order is likely to evolve toward a pattern of multipolar leadership, regional integration, and pluralistic co-governance, in which technological capability, resource control, and standard-setting authority jointly determine the reconfiguration of global power

China · Electricity · Energy policy · Energy transition · European union · Geopolitics · Hegemony · Incentive · Restructuring · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · Global Energy Security and Policy · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae