Talking the Party Line
Private Chinese Companies Between State Alignment and Business Interests
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17831754 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabine Mokry (0000-0002-3610-9775, Universität Hamburg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2634-3797 • E-ISSN: 2634-3797 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/isagsq/ksag067 |
| OpenAlex | W7155567497 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
This article examines the relationship between China’s 100 largest private companies by revenue and its foreign policy. Prior research has focused on the role of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in advancing China’s foreign policy, leaving the roles of private firms understudied. Yet, as private Chinese companies have become central to the US-China technological competition and increasingly important for China’s foreign relations, it is high time to learn more about their foreign policy engagement. Drawing on literature on state-business relations and links between societal actors and the state under authoritarian rule, this article contributes a novel approach to conceptualize how private companies engage with foreign policy rhetoric, which focuses on whether firms’ or the state’s interests are prioritized and firms’ mode of participation in foreign policy. The article finds that representatives from private Chinese companies mostly present their firms as implementers of China’s foreign policy. To a far lesser extent, they present them as policy advocates, beneficiaries, and supporters. Private firms emphasize their contributions to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), international cooperation, global development, and national rejuvenation. Their support is expressed through praise for the BRI, alignment with the government’s worldview, and commitment to China’s international goals. Only a few companies subtly advocate for policy changes to enhance trade. Overall, representatives from private Chinese companies exhibit a strong rhetorical alignment with China’s foreign policy. This research advances understanding of state-business relations in authoritarian settings and provides a conceptual framework for analyzing how societal actors engage with state policies in such regimes
Authoritarianism · Competitor analysis · Foreign policy · Mandate · Praise · Revenue · Belt and Road Initiative · Herbal Medicine and Trade Cooperation · International Relations and Foreign Policy
Defending the Authoritarian Regime Online
Reverse-engineering censorship in China
Party-State Capitalism in China
Constructing an Analytical Framework for Explaining Chinese Foreign Policy
A China in Transition
The impact of NOCs in Chinese foreign policy
The domestic sources of China’s more assertive foreign policy
China’s State-owned Enterprises
How New and Assertive Is China's New Assertiveness
The Role of Chinese Corporate Players in China’s South China Sea Policy
State-in-Society 2.0
Is Covid-Era Assertiveness in Chinese Foreign Policy Novel
Rethinking the Role of State-owned Enterprises in China’s Rise
Chinese Power and the State-Owned Enterprise
Designing authoritarian deliberation
The politics of civil society narratives in contestation between liberalism and nationalism in authoritarian Vietnam
Community of common destiny
Earthquakes and the typologies of state-society relations in China
Strongman politics and China's foreign policy actors
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression
How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument
Winds of Change
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |