Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How do environmental protection taxes affect the ESG performance of heavy polluters? Evidence from China

Bibliographic Data

ID17832002
AuthorsLidao He (Yunnan University of Finance And Economics), Yaqian Li (0000-0003-4225-620X, Yunnan University of Finance And Economics), Shitao Quan (Yunnan University of Finance And Economics, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume13
Issue1
Publication date2026-03-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/s41599-026-06848-2
OpenAlexW7135404172
LanguageEN
References cited48

As a pivotal measure in the green-oriented reform of China’s tax system, the Environmental Protection Tax plays a crucial role in exploring how tax policies regulate enterprises’ environmental and social behaviors. In this paper, based on the implementation of environmental protection tax as a quasi-natural experiment, we empirically investigate the impact of environmental protection tax on the ESG performance of heavily polluting enterprises based on the data of 3414 listed companies in A-shares of Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2013 to 2022 using the triple-difference model. The results demonstrate that the introduction of the Environmental Protection Tax significantly enhances the ESG performance of heavily polluting enterprises, and its action mechanism is primarily realized by promoting enterprises’ environmental protection investment and alleviating their financing constraints. Heterogeneity analysis results indicate that the ESG incentive effect of the Environmental Protection Tax is more pronounced for enterprises located in eastern and central China, those subject to high media attention, and those with political connections. Accordingly, this study proposes the following policy recommendations: continuously optimize the Environmental Protection Tax policy system, strengthen law enforcement, dynamically adjust tax collection standards, formulate differentiated policies, and improve information disclosure mechanisms by leveraging media monitoring. These measures aim to enhance the effectiveness of policy implementation and drive the improvement of ESG performance among heavily polluting enterprises. Additionally, it is recommended to improve the policy support system for environmental protection investment, deepen the reform of the green financial system, facilitate the green transformation of industries, and further promote high-quality and sustainable economic development

Action plan · China · Environmental tax · Incentive · Sustainable development · Tax credit · Tax reform · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?

    S N Kaplan, Luigi Zingales•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1997

  • Financial Constraints Risk

    Toni M Whited, Guojun Wu•Review of Financial Studies•2006

  • The triple difference estimator

    Open Access•Andreas Olden, Jarle Møen•The Econometrics Journal•2022

  • M&A activity as a driver for better ESG performance

    Open Access•Ví­ctor Barros, Pedro Verga Matos et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae