Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluating literary translation by large language models

A multidimensional quality assessment of Shen Congwen’s Border Town

Bibliographic Data

ID17832306
AuthorsWei Yang (0000-0001-7249-4386, Zunyi Medical University), Mingxing Yang (0000-0001-6327-2263, Zunyi Medical University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-03-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/s41599-026-06868-y
OpenAlexW7135396059
LanguageEN
References cited25

Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable abilities in understanding and generating human language, which is applied in transferring languages. However, the translation of literary works presents unique challenges. The translation quality of literary works generated by LLMs is yet to be explored and tested. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the quality of translations produced by various LLMs in comparison to a well-established human-translated work. The famous Chinese literary work Border Town by Shen Congwen was selected as the source text. ChatGPT 4, ChatGPT 4o, WXYY 4.0 Turbo, and Gemini were adopted as the models to process the translation. Jeffrey Kinkley’s translation was chosen as the human translation for comparison. This research employs Multidimensional Quality Metrics to evaluate translation quality by providing detailed error typologies. We focused on error analysis from three key dimensions of translation quality: accuracy, fidelity, and cultural appropriateness. The results showed that five types of errors were identified: mistranslation, omission, over-translation, cultural mistranslation, and discourse-level errors. Mistranslation has the top frequency in all models, omission occurs the most in Gemini, over translation and cultural mistranslation appear the most in GPT4. Discourse-level error occurred in WXYY 4.0 turbo the most. GPT-4o appears to yield comparatively higher translation quality under the MQM framework. The research reveals that literary translation by LLMs requires more specific training prompt strategies and human post-editing to improve its accuracy, fidelity, and cultural appropriateness

Cultural diversity · Literary Translation · Quality assessment · Target text · Translation studies · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Translation Studies and Practices

  • The Translator's Invisibility

    Lawrence Venuti•Translator's Invisibility•2003

  • The Translator’s Voice through the Translation of Characters’ Names in Bian Cheng

    Open Access•Xiaohui Guo, Lay Hoon Ang et al.•3L The Southeast Asian Journal of…•2020

  • Measuring translation difficulty

    Sanjun Sun•Across Languages and Cultures•2015

  • On scholar translators in literary translation – a case study of Kinkley's translation of ‘Biancheng’

    Minhui Xu•Perspectives•2012

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae