Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Towards a deeper understanding of information manipulation

Proposing a multilevel framework for the analysis of manipulative narratives

Bibliographic Data

ID17832508
AuthorsTimo Lenk (0000-0002-1161-3545, TU Dortmund University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume13
Issue1
Publication date2026-02-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/s41599-026-06656-8
OpenAlexW7128170180
LanguageEN
References cited62

Against the backdrop of rising populist movements and autocratic regimes worldwide, policy makers, publics, and academics are increasingly concerned about the negative impacts of mis- and disinformation on democracy. While there is debate about the actual share of fabricated content in online communication environments, such forms of information manipulation appear in many shapes and with varying degrees of deviation from facts. What unifies them is their use of narratives to distort public debate, sow division, and seed doubt in institutions. However, with increasing scholarly attention, the literature on information manipulation is becoming increasingly fragmented, calling for stronger integration. Particularly, different strands of research use either framing or narrative perspectives in their analyses. After reviewing essential forms of information manipulation and systematizing them on different levels of analysis, the paper addresses this fragmentation by proposing and testing a multilevel framework that integrates both framing and narrative perspectives on information manipulation. The framework was tested in an exploratory case study in the context of the 2024 European Parliament elections. Based on the results, the benefits and limitations of the framework are discussed. The overall aim of this paper is to add to the systematic use of terminology in the analysis of information manipulation phenomena

Adversarial system · Autocracy · Disinformation · Narrative · Negotiation · Terminology · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics

  • The Grounded Theory Method

    A Bryant•Oxford Handbook of Qualitative…•2020

  • Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding

    Robert Thornberg, Kathy Charmaz•The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative…•2014

  • Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success

    Open Access•L Bromham, Russell Dinnage et al.•Nature•2016

  • Defeating the merchants of doubt

    Open Access•Naomi Oreskes, Erik M Conway•Nature•2010

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • Beyond online disinformation

    Open Access•Marius Dragomir, José Rúas-Araújo et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Disinformation on the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine War

    Open Access•Rocío Sánchez del Vas, Jorge Tuñón Navarro•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Social Bots and Their Coordination During Online Campaigns

    Open Access•Tuja Khaund, Baris Kirdemir et al.•IEEE Transactions on Computational…•2022

  • David vs. Goliath

    Cheryl S Y Shea, Yanru Jiang et al.•Review of Communication•2022

  • Navigating moral minefields in a Vuca world

    Open Access•Timo Lenk•Journal of Communication Management•2024

  • Post-truth public diplomacy

    H Denis Wu•Journal of International…•2023

  • Destruct, direct and suppress

    Open Access•Edward Deverell, Charlotte Wagnsson et al.•Journal of International…•2021

  • Narrative composition of Russian public diplomacy

    Ignat Vershinin•Journal of International…•2023

  • What Makes Populist Messages Persuasive? Experimental Evidence for How Emotions and Issue Characteristics Moderate Populist Framing Effects

    Open Access•Dieter Dekeyser, H Roose•Communication Research•2023

  • Framing as a Bridging Concept for Climate Change Communication

    Open Access•Lars Guenther, Susan Jörges et al.•Communication Research•2024

  • Barriers to Participation in Polarized Online Discussions About Covid-19 and the Russo-Ukrainian War

    Open Access•Martina Novotná, Alena Macková et al.•Media and Communication•2023

  • Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media

    Open Access•Jianxun Chu, Yuqi Zhu et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Right-wing populism, visual disinformation, and Brexit

    Simon Faulkner, Hannah Guy et al.•2021

  • Trolls without borders

    Open Access•Dror Walter, Yotam Ophir•Human Communication Research•2023

  • Analyzing frame analysis

    Open Access•T A Van Dijk•Discourse Studies•2023

  • Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking

    Lewandowsky, Sander Van Der Linden•European Review of Social…•2021

  • Content Analysis of Mediated Associations

    Florian Arendt, Narin Karadas•Communication Methods and Measures•2017

  • The fog of words

    Open Access•Fabrizio Coticchia, Andrea Catanzaro•Media War & Conflict•2020

  • Tears and Framing Contests

    Øyvind Ihlen, Kjersti Thorbjørnsrud•International Journal of…•2013

  • Online disinformation on Facebook

    João Pedro Baptista, Anabela Gradim•Journal of Contemporary European…•2020

  • Weaponizing narrative

    Andriy Tyushka•Journal of Contemporary European…•2021

  • Theorizing From the Global South

    Open Access•M J Dutta, Mahuya Pal•Communication Theory•2020

  • Resonance to archetypes in media

    Open Access•Michael A Faber, John D Mayer•Journal of Research in Personality•2009

  • The six scenario archetypes framework

    Open Access•Alessandro Fergnani, Zhaoli Song•Futures•2020

  • Strategic Narratives

    Alister Miskimmon, Ben O’loughlin et al.•Strategic Narratives•2014

  • Political Astroturfing on Twitter

    Franziska Barbara Keller, David Schoch et al.•Political Communication•2020

  • Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice

    Open Access•Fabian Zimmermann, Matthias Kohring•Political Communication•2020

  • Digital astroturfing in politics

    Open Access•Marko Kovic, Adrian Rauchfleisch et al.•Studies in Communication Sciences•2018

  • Framing

    Open Access•Robert M Entman•Journal of Communication•1993

  • Populist Disinformation

    Open Access•Michael Hameleers•Politics and Governance•2020

  • Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Felix Zimmer et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • Influence and Improvisation

    Open Access•Kate Starbird, Renée Diresta et al.•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Framing Processes and Social Movements

    Robert D Benford, David A Snow•Annual Review of Sociology•2000

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae