Towards a deeper understanding of information manipulation
Proposing a multilevel framework for the analysis of manipulative narratives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17832508 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Timo Lenk (0000-0002-1161-3545, TU Dortmund University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-026-06656-8 |
| OpenAlex | W7128170180 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 62 |
Against the backdrop of rising populist movements and autocratic regimes worldwide, policy makers, publics, and academics are increasingly concerned about the negative impacts of mis- and disinformation on democracy. While there is debate about the actual share of fabricated content in online communication environments, such forms of information manipulation appear in many shapes and with varying degrees of deviation from facts. What unifies them is their use of narratives to distort public debate, sow division, and seed doubt in institutions. However, with increasing scholarly attention, the literature on information manipulation is becoming increasingly fragmented, calling for stronger integration. Particularly, different strands of research use either framing or narrative perspectives in their analyses. After reviewing essential forms of information manipulation and systematizing them on different levels of analysis, the paper addresses this fragmentation by proposing and testing a multilevel framework that integrates both framing and narrative perspectives on information manipulation. The framework was tested in an exploratory case study in the context of the 2024 European Parliament elections. Based on the results, the benefits and limitations of the framework are discussed. The overall aim of this paper is to add to the systematic use of terminology in the analysis of information manipulation phenomena
Adversarial system · Autocracy · Disinformation · Narrative · Negotiation · Terminology · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Social Media and Politics
The Grounded Theory Method
Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding
Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success
Defeating the merchants of doubt
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Beyond online disinformation
Disinformation on the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine War
Social Bots and Their Coordination During Online Campaigns
David vs. Goliath
Navigating moral minefields in a Vuca world
Post-truth public diplomacy
Destruct, direct and suppress
Narrative composition of Russian public diplomacy
What Makes Populist Messages Persuasive? Experimental Evidence for How Emotions and Issue Characteristics Moderate Populist Framing Effects
Framing as a Bridging Concept for Climate Change Communication
Barriers to Participation in Polarized Online Discussions About Covid-19 and the Russo-Ukrainian War
Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media
Right-wing populism, visual disinformation, and Brexit
Trolls without borders
Analyzing frame analysis
Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking
Content Analysis of Mediated Associations
The fog of words
Tears and Framing Contests
Online disinformation on Facebook
Weaponizing narrative
Theorizing From the Global South
Resonance to archetypes in media
The six scenario archetypes framework
Strategic Narratives
Political Astroturfing on Twitter
Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice
Digital astroturfing in politics
Framing
Populist Disinformation
Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries
Influence and Improvisation
Framing Processes and Social Movements
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |