Complexity, usefulness, and optimality
A response to Foster (2010)
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 17869269 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Keith F Widaman (0000-0002-6424-3998, University of California, Davis), Shannon J Dogan, Gary D Stockdale, Rand D Conger |
| Ano | 2010 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 1767-1770 |
| Data de publicação | 2010-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Developmental Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0012-1649 • E-ISSN: 1939-0599 |
| Editora | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/a0021293 |
| PMID | 21058836 |
| PMCID | PMC4069858 |
| OpenAlex | W2094077386 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 10 |
In his commentary, Foster (2010) made arguments at 2 levels, offering a broad critique of statistical or methodological approaches in developmental psychology in general together with critical comments that applied only to our recent article (Dogan, Stockdale, Widaman, & Conger, 2010). Certain criticisms by Foster aimed at the field as a whole appear to be justified, whereas others seem overly broad and of dubious validity. In addition, Foster ignored the full range of methodologies used by both developmental psychologists and economists to pursue the identification of causal processes. Other critical remarks by Foster were directed specifically at our article, and many of these are simply incorrect, reflecting Foster's failure to recognize the standards in developmental psychology or his failure to note specific comments or descriptions we provided in our article. Future exchanges regarding methodological innovations and priorities in developmental psychology and economics should enrich and inform one another, rather than taking the form of one field dictating to the other the correct way to pursue science
Developmental psychology · Developmental Science · Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · Identification (biology) · Economic Growth and Productivity · Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting · Psychology
Modeling Contextual Effects in Longitudinal Studies
Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments
Distributional Assumptions of Growth Mixture Models
Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies
Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data.
Testing Mediational Models With Longitudinal Data
Developmental relations and patterns of change between alcohol use and number of sexual partners from adolescence through adulthood
Statistical methods in psychology journals
A critique of cross-lagged correlation
Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes,and Individual Development
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,07 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2011 - 2011 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |