Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

“The Cat Sat on the …?” Why Generative AI Has Limited Creativity

Bibliographic Data

ID17897418
AuthorsDavid H Cropley (0000-0002-7964-6538, UniSA STEM University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume59
Issue4
Publication date2025-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Creative Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0175 • E-ISSN: 2162-6057
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/jocb.70077
OpenAlexW7105067839
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited30

Since the introduction of Generative AI several years ago, there has been much debate regarding the capacity of this technology for creativity. This paper applies the standard definition of creativity to the output of Large Language Models (LLMs) and shows not only that this can be calculated ex ante, but that LLM output creativity has a fundamental upper limit. This upper limit, determined by the mechanism used to produce LLM outputs, moreover, is constrained to a level equivalent to the boundary between little‐c and Pro‐c creativity. Consequently, LLM creativity is mathematically constrained to a level equivalent to the boundary between amateur and professional human creativity. This has significant implications for claims about AI autonomy in creative tasks

Amateur · Autonomy · Boundary (topology) · Creativity · Generative grammar · Artificial Intelligence in Games · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience

  • Six basic image schemata of creative design thinking from the perspective of categorization

    Open Access•Chenye Lin, Shengxi Fan et al.•Thinking Skills and Creativity•2026

  • Taking the U.S. Patent Office Criteria Seriously

    Dean K Simonton•Creativity Research Journal•2012

  • Classroom contexts for creativity

    Ronald A Beghetto, James C Kaufman•High Ability Studies•2014

  • Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire

    Shelley Carson, Shelley H Carson et al.•Creativity Research Journal•2005

  • Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks

    Paul J Silvia, Beate P Winterstein et al.•Psychology of Aesthetics…•2008

  • The Standard Definition of Creativity

    Mark A Runco, Garrett J Jaeger•Creativity Research Journal•2012

  • Divergent thinking is linked with convergent thinking; implications for models of creativity

    Open Access•Bruce Rawlings, Daisy Chetwynd-Talbot et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2025

  • The Language of Creativity

    Open Access•William Orwig, Emma R Edenbaum et al.•The Journal of Creative Behavior•2024

  • On the creativity of large language models

    Open Access•Giorgio Franceschelli, Mirco Musolesi•AI & Society•2025

  • Human‐ AI Co‐Creativity

    Open Access•Kelsey Medeiros, David H Cropley et al.•The Journal of Creative Behavior•2025

  • Beyond Big and Little

    Open Access•James C Kaufman, Ronald A Beghetto•Review of General Psychology•2009

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae