The Making of a “Freud Basher,” or Reflections of a “Supercilious Neurotic…”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18066820 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Todd Dufresne (Lakehead University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-82 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The European Legacy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1084-8770 • E-ISSN: 1470-1316 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10848770.2013.859784 |
| OpenAlex | W2028348242 |
| Language | EN |
A well-known critic of Freud discusses in frank terms the features of psychoanalysis that still attract scholarly interest, and the polemics that deform research and defames criticism. The author defends Freud criticism from ad hominem charges and outlines serious problems with scholarship in the field, including fraud, bad faith, and a disregard for professional standards. But he also indulges and explores the supposedly “pathological” undercurrents of Freud criticism. His surprising conclusion: in a way the field of Freud Studies is sick, and does bring out the worst in everyone
Criticism · Epistemology · Faith · Freud's Psychoanalytic Theories · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Psychoanalytic theory · Scholarship · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
| Highly cited | No |
|---|