Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The U.S. Presidential Election 2012/2016 and Investors’ Sentiment

The Case of CBOE Market Volatility Index

Bibliographic Data

ID18096016
AuthorsImlak Shaikh (0000-0001-5704-9938, Management Development Institute, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume9
Issue3
Publication date2019-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/2158244019864175
OpenAlexW2963587814
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited41

Given that political events have substantial effect on new economic policies and economic performance of the country, this article aims to examine the behavior of the investors’ sentiment in terms of implied volatility index trailed by the U.S. presidential elections. The study empirically tests whether the presidential elections in 2012/2016 do contain the important market inclusive information to explain the expected stock market volatility. The findings indicate that investors’ concern was distracted around the presidential elections window, albeit the market performed identically in both the presidential election years. The significant fall in the implied volatility level (post-election period) is the calm before the storm, just wait and watch. The positive estimate uncovers the fact that investor worries were higher before the election day. In particular, the significant estimate of the presidential election debate shows that investors do regard the minutes of the presidential election debates in their portfolio selection. At the two elections era, on the candidacy of both the parties, the empirical result speaks marginally contrasting outcomes and falsifies the presidential election cycle hypothesis of past 29 U.S. election years. Empirical estimates conclude that the presidential elections in 2012/2016 have a strong, significant relationship with investor’s sentiment and stock market performance

Economics · Financial economics · Monetary economics · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Stock market · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Law · Market Dynamics and Volatility

  • Data selection and collection for constructing investor sentiment from social media

    Open Access•Q Liu, Hosung Son•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • The Global Stock Market Reactions to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

    Open Access•Delia Elena Diaconaşu, Seyed Mehdian et al.•SAGE Open•2023

  • Electoral Shockwaves

    Open Access•Murugesan Gayathri, Sharon Sophia•SAGE Open•2025

  • Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty

    Scott Baker, Scott R Baker et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2016

  • The Political Business Cycle

    William D Nordhaus•The Review of Economic Studies•1975

  • Markets as Predictors of Election Outcomes

    Robert Forsythe, Murray Z Frank et al.•Canadian Public Policy•1998

  • Can we insure against political uncertainty? Evidence from the U.S. stock market

    Open Access•Andrea Mattozzi•Public Choice•2008

  • Partisan politics and stock market performance

    Open Access•Roland Füss, Michael M Bechtel•Public Choice•2008

  • A Political Model of the Business Cycle

    C Duncan MacRae•Journal of Political Economy•1977

  • Market Responses to Politics

    Open Access•Nathan M Jensen, Scott Schmith•Comparative Political Studies•2005

  • Political Institutions, Policy Expectations, and the 1980 Election

    Brian E Roberts•American Journal of Political…•1990

Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae