The publishing dilemma of the American Psychological Association
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18940447 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George D Lundberg (Medscape, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 211-212 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Psychologist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/0003-066x.57.3.211 |
| PMID | 11905122 |
| OpenAlex | W1996761004 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
Primary source peer reviewed journals have come to be known as the gold standard for biomedical science since their origin about 300 years ago. Relationships between the journal owners, who have total business authority, and the editors, who have total intellectual authority, have a tendency to become strained. Careful, reasonable adherence by all concerned to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Association of Medical Editors can greatly alleviate these tensions and serve to benefit the readers and the public
Association (psychology) · Dilemma · Epistemology · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Psychotherapist · Publishing · Sociology · Academic Writing and Publishing · Clinical Psychology · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Health Sciences Research and Education · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2002 - 2002 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |