Ethical and methodological implications of social media for participant recruitment
Amazon’s workforce in Poland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18947646 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Miszczynski (0000-0002-9140-1322, Kozminski University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 357-380 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Organizational Ethnography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2046-6749 • E-ISSN: 2046-6757 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/joe-06-2024-0029 |
| OpenAlex | W4411516564 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 75 |
Purpose The article explores the ethical and methodological implications of recruiting participants via social media in organisation studies. It addresses the challenges of engaging with hard-to-reach groups in highly controlled environments and the complexities of maintaining trust and ethical standards. It also offers practical, actionable recommendations for researchers navigating digital recruitment, including strategies for verifying participant authenticity, addressing digital exclusion, and mitigating platform-specific risks. Design/methodology/approach The article is based on a case study of a research project focusing on Amazon’s warehouse operations in Poland. Relying on the use of social media for participant recruitment, the article shares reflections and insights on the fieldwork experience as well as challenges associated with adaptation of the research design to the realities of the workforce studied here. Findings This study finds that digital recruitment is an effective yet ethically complex approach for engaging hard-to-reach populations in surveilled workplaces. It demonstrates how digital recruitment both complements and challenges traditional ethnographic methods, particularly in contexts where workplace surveillance and algorithmic control influence worker trust and research participation. The study offers actionable recommendations for ensuring ethical, inclusive, and methodologically rigorous recruitment in organisational research. Originality/value This study provides a novel contribution to organisational ethnography by examining the intersection of digital recruitment, workplace surveillance, and participant trust in hard-to-reach populations. While prior research has explored digital ethnography and social media recruitment separately, this paper uniquely focuses on the methodological and ethical complexities of recruiting participants in algorithmically managed, high-surveillance workplaces
Ethnography · Knowledge management · Originality · Participant observation · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social media · Social science · Sociology · Workforce · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Social Media in Health Education
Virtual Ethnography
"Algorithms ruin everything"
Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool
Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization
A rapid review of the benefits and challenges of dynamic consent
Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet
Promoting human-centred AI in the workplace. Trade unions and their strategies for regulating the use of AI in Germany
Influence of algorithmic management practices on workplace well-being – evidence from European organisations
The digital divide
Lie for a Dime
Mutual dependency
“But the data is already public”
Fabrication as Ethical Practice
‘Imposter participants’ in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity
Toward a Participatory Digital Ethnography of Blockchain Governance
(Re)Locating boundaries
The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI)
Recruiting Fathers for Parenting Research
Bridging the digital divide
Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism
Between control and participation
The ethics and politics of data sets in the age of machine learning
You have one identity
Three lies of digital ethnography
Community-Academic Research on Hard-to-Reach Populations
Suspicious and fraudulent online survey participation
Control and Flexibility
Coercion, Consent, and Class Consciousness
Where Have All the Data Gone? A Critical Reflection on Academic Digital Research in the Post-API Age
Successful Recruitment to Qualitative Research
Reconceptualizing Recruitment in Qualitative Research
Email Interviews
Netnography
What Affects People's Willingness to Participate in Qualitative Research? An Experimental Comparison of Five Incentives
Who can you trust these days
Online, offline, hybrid
Digitally shaped ethnographic relationships during a global pandemic and beyond
Active engagement with stigmatised communities through digital ethnography
An invitation to use craigslist ads to recruit respondents from stigmatized groups for qualitative interviews
Working with vulnerable groups in social research
Memeing a conspiracy theory
Legitimising digital anthropology through immersive cohabitation
Coercion and Consent under Techno-Economic Despotism
Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era
Prime Suspect
What Do We Mean By a 'Hard-to-reach' Population? Legitimacy Versus Precarity as Barriers to Access
Short essay
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |