Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ethical and methodological implications of social media for participant recruitment

Amazon’s workforce in Poland

Bibliographic Data

ID18947646
AuthorsM Miszczynski (0000-0002-9140-1322, Kozminski University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume14
Issue3
Pages357-380
Publication date2025-11-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Organizational Ethnography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2046-6749 • E-ISSN: 2046-6757
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/joe-06-2024-0029
OpenAlexW4411516564
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited75

Purpose The article explores the ethical and methodological implications of recruiting participants via social media in organisation studies. It addresses the challenges of engaging with hard-to-reach groups in highly controlled environments and the complexities of maintaining trust and ethical standards. It also offers practical, actionable recommendations for researchers navigating digital recruitment, including strategies for verifying participant authenticity, addressing digital exclusion, and mitigating platform-specific risks. Design/methodology/approach The article is based on a case study of a research project focusing on Amazon’s warehouse operations in Poland. Relying on the use of social media for participant recruitment, the article shares reflections and insights on the fieldwork experience as well as challenges associated with adaptation of the research design to the realities of the workforce studied here. Findings This study finds that digital recruitment is an effective yet ethically complex approach for engaging hard-to-reach populations in surveilled workplaces. It demonstrates how digital recruitment both complements and challenges traditional ethnographic methods, particularly in contexts where workplace surveillance and algorithmic control influence worker trust and research participation. The study offers actionable recommendations for ensuring ethical, inclusive, and methodologically rigorous recruitment in organisational research. Originality/value This study provides a novel contribution to organisational ethnography by examining the intersection of digital recruitment, workplace surveillance, and participant trust in hard-to-reach populations. While prior research has explored digital ethnography and social media recruitment separately, this paper uniquely focuses on the methodological and ethical complexities of recruiting participants in algorithmically managed, high-surveillance workplaces

Ethnography · Knowledge management · Originality · Participant observation · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social media · Social science · Sociology · Workforce · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Social Media in Health Education

  • Online Ethnography

    Open Access•Gloria Hongyee Chan, Gabriel Kwun Wa Lee et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Draining bodies without care

    Milosz Miszczynski•Culture and Organization•2026

  • Virtual Ethnography

    Christine Hine•Virtual Ethnography•2000

  • "Algorithms ruin everything"

    Open Access•Michael A DeVito, Darren Gergle et al.•Proceedings of the 2017 CHI…•2017

  • Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool

    Luke Gelinas, Robin Pierce et al.•The American Journal of Bioethics•2017

  • Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization

    Open Access•Engin Bozdag•Ethics and Information Technology•2013

  • A rapid review of the benefits and challenges of dynamic consent

    Open Access•Winnie Lay, L Gasparini et al.•Research Ethics•2025

  • Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet

    Open Access•Håkan Salwén•Science and Engineering Ethics•2021

  • Promoting human-centred AI in the workplace. Trade unions and their strategies for regulating the use of AI in Germany

    Open Access•Martin Krzywdzinski, Detlef Gerst et al.•Transfer European Review of…•2023

  • Influence of algorithmic management practices on workplace well-being – evidence from European organisations

    Open Access•Hanna Kinowska, Łukasz Jakub Sienkiewicz•Information Technology and People•2023

  • The digital divide

    Open Access•Sophie Lythreatis, Sanjay Kumar Singh et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Lie for a Dime

    Open Access•Joan Chandler, Jesse J Chandler et al.•Social Psychological and…•2017

  • Mutual dependency

    Open Access•M Miszczynski•Organization•2020

  • “But the data is already public”

    Open Access•Michael Zimmer•Ethics and Information Technology•2010

  • Fabrication as Ethical Practice

    A N Markham, Annette Markham•Information Communication & Society•2012

  • ‘Imposter participants’ in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity

    Open Access•Damien Ridge, Laurna Bullock et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • Toward a Participatory Digital Ethnography of Blockchain Governance

    Open Access•Ellie Rennie, Michael Zargham et al.•Qualitative Inquiry•2022

  • (Re)Locating boundaries

    Open Access•Deniz Tunçalp, Patrick L Lê et al.•Journal of Organizational…•2014

  • The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI)

    Open Access•Katja Kaufmann, Corinna Peil•Mobile Media & Communication•2019

  • Recruiting Fathers for Parenting Research

    Haley E Yaremych, Persky•Parenting•2022

  • Bridging the digital divide

    Kerry Gibson•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2020

  • Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism

    Open Access•Alessandro Delfanti•New Media & Society•2019

  • Between control and participation

    Open Access•Martin Krzywdzinski, Daniel Schneiß et al.•New Technology Work and Employment•2025

  • The ethics and politics of data sets in the age of machine learning

    Open Access•Nanna Bonde Thylstrup•Media Culture & Society•2022

  • You have one identity

    Open Access•José Van Dijck•Media Culture & Society•2013

  • Three lies of digital ethnography

    Open Access•G De Seta•Journal of Digital Social Research•2020

  • Community-Academic Research on Hard-to-Reach Populations

    Open Access•Cecilia Benoit, Mikael Jansson et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2005

  • Suspicious and fraudulent online survey participation

    Open Access•John Lawlor, Carl Thomas et al.•Methodological Innovations•2021

  • Control and Flexibility

    Open Access•Martin Krzywdzinski, Maren Evers et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•2024

  • Coercion, Consent, and Class Consciousness

    Open Access•Steven Peter Valla, A K Kronberg et al.•Socius Sociological Research for…•2023

  • Where Have All the Data Gone? A Critical Reflection on Academic Digital Research in the Post-API Age

    Open Access•Rebekah Tromble•Social Media + Society•2021

  • Successful Recruitment to Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Kelly A Negrin, Susan E Slaughter et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Reconceptualizing Recruitment in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Isaac Bonisteel, Rayzel Shulman et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Email Interviews

    Open Access•Emma Dahlin•International Journal of…•2021

  • Netnography

    Open Access•Leesa Costello, Marie-Louise Mcdermott et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • What Affects People's Willingness to Participate in Qualitative Research? An Experimental Comparison of Five Incentives

    Open Access•Bridget Kelly, Marjorie Margolis et al.•CAM•2017

  • Who can you trust these days

    Open Access•A Santinele Martino, Arielle Perrotta et al.•Qualitative Research•2024

  • Online, offline, hybrid

    Open Access•Nona Schulte-Römer, Friederike Gesing•Qualitative Research•2023

  • Digitally shaped ethnographic relationships during a global pandemic and beyond

    Open Access•Jaymelee Kim, Sierra Williams et al.•Qualitative Research•2023

  • Active engagement with stigmatised communities through digital ethnography

    Open Access•Monica J Barratt, Amrei Maddox et al.•Qualitative Research•2016

  • An invitation to use craigslist ads to recruit respondents from stigmatized groups for qualitative interviews

    Open Access•Meredith G F Worthen, Meredith Gf Worthen•Qualitative Research•2014

  • Working with vulnerable groups in social research

    Open Access•Jo Aldridge•Qualitative Research•2014

  • Memeing a conspiracy theory

    Open Access•Luis M Hernández Aguilar•Ethnography•2024

  • Legitimising digital anthropology through immersive cohabitation

    Open Access•Joshua M Bluteau•Ethnography•2021

  • Coercion and Consent under Techno-Economic Despotism

    Open Access•M Miszczynski, P Zanoni•Work Employment and Society•2025

  • Ethnographic Research in a Cyber Era

    Open Access•Ronald E Hallett, Kristen Barber•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2014

  • Prime Suspect

    Open Access•Steven Peter Valla, H Johnston et al.•Work and Occupations•2022

  • What Do We Mean By a 'Hard-to-reach' Population? Legitimacy Versus Precarity as Barriers to Access

    Open Access•Rachel Ellis•Sociological Methods & Research•2023

  • Short essay

    Open Access•Tsoghik Grigoryan•Journal of Organizational…•2024

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae