Patriotic Science
The Covid-19 Pandemic and the Politics of Indigeneity and Decoloniality in Sri Lanka
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18948941 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harshana Rambukwella (Postgraduate Institute of English, The Open University of Sri Lanka, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 828-845 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-18 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interventions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-801X • E-ISSN: 1469-929X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369801x.2022.2158488 |
| OpenAlex | W4312192237 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 13 |
During the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (a global highly contagious respiratory infection) in early 2020, Sri Lanka witnessed an upsurge in indigenous discourses. These ranged from claims by western medical doctors that pirit pæn (water blessed during Buddhist chanting) has scientifically proven health benefits to endorsements of a divinely inspired syrup. These discourses gained wide publicity and received state endorsement with the health minister consuming the syrup on national television. But by early 2021 these discourses had lost their lustre and the health minister contracted COVID. These "alternative" discourses nearly derailed the country's vaccination program. By 2021, many who backed these ideas had lost credibility and the state and public began to place faith in vaccination. The sudden public visibility of these indigenous discourses and their swift decline speaks to the complex politics of indigeneity. This essay uses the Sri Lankan case to argue that decoloniality, which has become a global theoretical trend, in some instances is insufficiently self-reflexive of how its conceptual premises are appropriated by nativist discourses. The fetishization of the indigenous can have devastating consequences. When Sri Lankan western-trained doctors spoke on behalf of a romanticized indigeneity they were appropriating the authority of indigenous medicine, which had historically fashioned itself as a "scientifically" valid hybrid alternative. When variants of decolonial thinking promote a radically "non-modern" ontology and epistemology, a similar process of romanticization occurs. I conclude with a call for a critical practice that recognizes how the so-called "modern" and "traditional" are more apparent than real and are deeply implicated in each other. I also argue for the importance of recognizing the significance of an agonistic critical orientation that is not resistant to knowledge based on its putative "western" origins
Indigenous · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Public health · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Gender Studies · Law · Medicine · South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Missing in action
The politics of glyphosate regulation
Pharmaceutical messianism and the politics of Covid-19 in the United States
Volunteering While Researching Conflict and Violence
On the concept of the pluriverse in Walter Mignolo and the European New Right
Decoloniality and language scholarship - a critical intervention
Defending heroic soldiers at the United Nations Human Rights Council
| Citations per year | 2.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |