Hobbesian Instinctual Reason versus Rousseau’s Instinctual Innocence
Backstage logic of colonial expansions and origin of the left–right political dichotomy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18949270 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nusret Sinan Evcan (0000-0002-0641-2562, Cyprus International University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 977-997 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interventions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-801X • E-ISSN: 1469-929X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1369801x.2019.1585910 |
| OpenAlex | W2921868254 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 26 |
This essay discusses three dimensions that differentiate Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan from Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origins of Inequality in which the origins of the Left–Right political distinction and the seeds of the colonialist–anticolonialist debate can be explored. The study initially focuses on the diametrically opposed political ideas of the two philosophers regarding the “state of nature” and their perception of human nature in general. The second section is based on the fundamental differences between the two philosophers’ trust and distrust of human nature. In the third setion the essay tries to assess the two authors’ disagreements over the notion of progress, and synthesizes a new concept, instinctual reason, which is distilled from a Hobbesian chain of thought and Rousseau’s subsequent criticism. Through this synthesis, the study aims to elucidate the backstage logic of imperialist/colonialist expansions and explore the origins of the Left–Right distinction. In the final analysis, this essay aims to reveal that Hobbesian instinctual reason is one of the primary impulses of colonialist expansions, whilst Rousseau’s instinctual innocence is in essence anticolonialist. By the same token, the essay argues the Hobbesian position in these three dimensions constitutes the origins of modern right-wing political ideologies, whilst Rousseau’s position has inspired the leftist stance
Chivalry · Criticism · Epistemology · Ideology · Innocence · Literature · Political philosophy · Politics · Psychoanalysis · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Psychology · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Le Code noir, ou, Le calvaire de Canaan
Manifesto of the Communist Party
Odi et Amo? Hobbes on the State of Nature
The Origins of Totalitarianism
The Making of Modern Liberalism
Liberalism and Empire
Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development
Rethinking the Social–Political through Ibn Khaldûn and Aristotle
Models of Man
The liberal slip of Thomas Hobbes's authoritarian pen
Plastic man and the state of nature
The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought
The Postcolonial Enlightenment
Nature, civility and eschatology
The origins of totalitarianism
Hobbes on Barbarism and Civilization
Fugitive Rousseau
Reading Rousseau in the Colonies
Finite Community
The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770-1823
Hobbes, Savagery, and International Anarchy
Hegel, Haiti, and Universal History
The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |