Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Neuroarchaeology – New Prospects, Old Problems

Bibliographic Data

ID18958792
AuthorsAnatoly M Kuznetsov (Far Eastern Federal University), Anatoly Kuznetsov (0000-0002-2333-3380, Far Eastern Federal University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Issue1
Pages187-197
Publication date2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRossiiskaia arkheologiia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0869-6063 • E-ISSN: 3034-5774
PublisherThe Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.31857/s0869606322040109
OpenAlexW4395004336
LanguageEN
References cited35

The article discusses the main ideas of British neuroarchaeology and American cognitive archaeology as well as their practical implementation. Neuro/cognitive archaeology is a new area of research that emerged at the junction of the social/cultural neuro/cognitive sciences and Palaeolithic archaeology. The basis of this line of research is the concept of “social brain”, which views this organ as a social/cultural “artifact”. Such an interpretation suggests that brain activity as well as another important human quality, mind, should be considered in conjunction with its corporeality and external environment. This idea has been further developed by L. Malafouris in his material engagement theory. He connected the mind with the ability to think and with tools in a process of tool activity. However, for the correct application of this theory, it is crucial to distinguish between ancient tools from natural mediators used by animals. The introduction of this distinction permits to establish an unambiguous connection of the emergence of tool making and mind with the beginning of the Oldowan. The previous stage of development (from 7 to 2.6 million years) was the period of the formation of preconditions for the transition that marked the beginning of the sociocultural development of our most ancient ancestors, which influenced their biosocial nature

Political science · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Paleopathology and ancient diseases · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

  • E Cognition

    Albert Newen, Shaun Gallagher et al.•The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition•2018

  • Accessing Hominin Cognition

    James Cole•Cognitive Models in Palaeolithic…•2016

  • Origins and Revolutions

    Open Access•C Gamble•Origins and Revolutions•2007

  • How Things Shape the Mind

    L Malafouris, Colin Renfrew•How Things Shape the Mind•2013

  • Tools for the body (schema)

    Open Access•Angelo Maravita, Atsushi Iriki•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2004

  • The acheulean handaxe

    Open Access•Raymond Corbey, A A Simpkins et al.•Evolutionary Anthropology Issues…•2016

  • The elements of design form in Acheulian bifaces

    John A J Gowlett•Axe Age•2024

  • Theory of mind as a proxy for Palaeolithic language ability

    Open Access•Cory Marie Stade•Language Dynamics and Change•2020

  • Metaplasticity and the Primacy of Material Engagement

    L Malafouris•Time and Mind•2015

  • Palaeolithic culture of the Caucasus in the upper Eopleistocene

    H A Amirkhanov, Hizri Amirkhanov•Rossiiskaia arkheologiia•2020

  • Neuroarchaeology

    C D Laughlin•Time and Mind•2015

  • Most beautiful and most wonderful”

    Stephen J Lycett•Journal of Evolutionary Psychology•2011

  • On Tools Making Minds

    Karenleigh A Overmann, T Wynn•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2019

  • Materiality and Human Cognition

    Open Access•Karenleigh A Overmann, T Wynn•Journal of Archaeological Method…•2018

  • Biface Distributions And The Movius Line

    Adam Brumm, Mark W Moore•Australian Archaeology•2012

  • The symmetry of Acheulean handaxes and cognitive evolution

    Open Access•D Hodgson•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2015

  • An Introduction to Cognitive Archaeology

    Open Access•Frederick L Coolidge, T Wynn•Current Directions in Psychological…•2016

  • How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology

    Open Access•Tetsushi Nonaka, Blandine Bril et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2010

  • Goodwill hunting? Debates over the 'meaning' of Lower Palaeolithic handaxe form revisited

    P Spikins•World Archaeology•2012

  • Making hands and tools

    Open Access•L Malafouris•World Archaeology•2021

  • Human Evolution and the Archaeology of the Social Brain

    J A J Gowlett, John Gowlett et al.•Current Anthropology•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae