Neuroarchaeology – New Prospects, Old Problems
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18958792 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anatoly M Kuznetsov (Far Eastern Federal University), Anatoly Kuznetsov (0000-0002-2333-3380, Far Eastern Federal University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 187-197 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Rossiiskaia arkheologiia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0869-6063 • E-ISSN: 3034-5774 |
| Publisher | The Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.31857/s0869606322040109 |
| OpenAlex | W4395004336 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
The article discusses the main ideas of British neuroarchaeology and American cognitive archaeology as well as their practical implementation. Neuro/cognitive archaeology is a new area of research that emerged at the junction of the social/cultural neuro/cognitive sciences and Palaeolithic archaeology. The basis of this line of research is the concept of “social brain”, which views this organ as a social/cultural “artifact”. Such an interpretation suggests that brain activity as well as another important human quality, mind, should be considered in conjunction with its corporeality and external environment. This idea has been further developed by L. Malafouris in his material engagement theory. He connected the mind with the ability to think and with tools in a process of tool activity. However, for the correct application of this theory, it is crucial to distinguish between ancient tools from natural mediators used by animals. The introduction of this distinction permits to establish an unambiguous connection of the emergence of tool making and mind with the beginning of the Oldowan. The previous stage of development (from 7 to 2.6 million years) was the period of the formation of preconditions for the transition that marked the beginning of the sociocultural development of our most ancient ancestors, which influenced their biosocial nature
Political science · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Paleopathology and ancient diseases · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
E Cognition
Accessing Hominin Cognition
Origins and Revolutions
How Things Shape the Mind
Tools for the body (schema)
The acheulean handaxe
The elements of design form in Acheulian bifaces
Theory of mind as a proxy for Palaeolithic language ability
Metaplasticity and the Primacy of Material Engagement
Palaeolithic culture of the Caucasus in the upper Eopleistocene
Neuroarchaeology
Most beautiful and most wonderful”
On Tools Making Minds
Materiality and Human Cognition
Biface Distributions And The Movius Line
The symmetry of Acheulean handaxes and cognitive evolution
An Introduction to Cognitive Archaeology
How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology
Goodwill hunting? Debates over the 'meaning' of Lower Palaeolithic handaxe form revisited
Making hands and tools
Human Evolution and the Archaeology of the Social Brain
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |