Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Modernity, the Individual, and the Foundations of Cultural–Historical Activity Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID18968535
AuthorsAndy Blunden (0000-0001-7122-5811, Research Network (United States), corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume14
Issue4
Pages253-265
Publication date2007-10-11
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMind Culture and Activity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1074-9039 • E-ISSN: 1532-7884
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10749030701623722
OpenAlexW2075788700
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited8

It is argued that the problem of individual agency in relation to social institutions can be resolved within Cultural–Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) by the use of the “subject ” as a unit of analysis. Such an approach implies a reaffirmation of the fundamental tenets of CHAT but also a critique of the concepts of society and culture, which are appropriated by psychology. A successful critique of objectivist conceptions of society and culture requires an appropriate framing of the concept of subject. Two recent articles published in Mind, Culture, and Activity (Billett, 2006; Stetsenko, 2005) touched on the issue of the need for psychology in general, or Cultural–Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) in particular, to better reflect the capacity of individuals to exercise genuine agency alongside larger social forces. Stetsenko, for example, aimed to reveal: (a) individual and collective processes as being interrelated and co-evolving levels of activity, and (b) the practical relevance of human subjectivity alongside the human relevance of material practices. (p. 70) These writers observed, and rightly, that although the internalization of norms and discourses by individuals is well described by psychology in general, and CHAT in particular, the way in which individuals modify and create social rules, institutions, and ideology, and thereby exercise

Culture theory · Epistemology · Modernity · Objectivism · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Innovative Education and Learning Practices · Philosophy · Social Representations and Identity · Sociology and Education Studies

  • Afterword

    Open Access•Ana Maria R Gomes•Learning and Everyday Life•2019

  • Free will

    F Lebed•Philosophical Psychology•2025

  • Vygotsky’s Warning

    Mark G Edwards, Mark Edwards•Mind Culture and Activity•2016

  • The Intersection of Modernity, Globalization, Indigeneity, and Postcolonialism

    Michael Cottrell, Jane P Preston et al.•Diaspora Indigenous and Minority…•2012

  • Learning and Everyday Life

    Open Access•Jean Lave, Ana Maria R Gomes•Learning and Everyday Life•2019

  • Hegel's Science Of Logic Volume One

    W H Johnston And L G Struthers•Hegel's Science Of Logic Volume One•1966

  • Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds

    Carole Cain, Debra Skinner et al.•Identity and Agency in Cultural…•2001

  • The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity

    Jürgen Habermas, STEPHEN J TANNER et al.•The philosophical discourse of…•1985

  • Relational Interdependence Between Social and Individual Agency in Work and Working Life

    Billett•Mind Culture and Activity•2006

  • Activity as Object-Related

    A Stetsenko•Mind Culture and Activity•2005

  • System of Ethical Life and First Philosophy of Spirit

    Samuel L Hart, G W F Hegel et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1981

  • The philosophical discourse of modernity

    Jürgen Habermas•The philosophical discourse of…•1987

Citations per year0.36
Citation span2012 - 2025 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae