Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Praxeologische Feldforschung – Reichweite, Tragweite, Importanz und Relevanz als Analysekategorien

Datos Bibliográficos

ID18970206
AutoresKlaus Geiselhart (0000-0002-4753-817X), Simon Runkel (0000-0002-3774-2433, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, autor de correspondencia), Susann Schäfer (Friedrich Schiller University Jena), Benedikt Schmid (0000-0002-7296-6125, University of Freiburg)
Año2021
Volumen76
Número1
Páginas51-63
Fecha de publicación2021-03-12
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGeographica Helvetica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0016-7312 • E-ISSN: 2194-8798
EditorialCopernicus GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.5194/gh-76-51-2021
OpenAlexW3138696380
IdiomaDE
Referencias citadas26

This paper develops three analytical categories – range, supporting capacity, exigency/notability – to capture how supra-individual phenomena affect the people studied by empirical research. Researchers face a tension between constructivist and realist perspectives as the examined phenomena are simultaneously social constructs, in the way people perceive and understand them, and social facts in their consequences. Taking a critical perspective on the notion of large social phenomena – popularized by Theodore Schatzki – the paper develops an explorative terminology that aims to facilitate practice-oriented field research. Examples of empirical research on transition and degrowth initiatives illustrate how research subjects estimate the range of a phenomenon by trying to grasp whether they are in or out of its reach; the supportive capacity of a phenomenon by exploring how far it carries certain processes; and they experience the exigency of a phenomenon and ascribe a certain notability to it. Taken together, this terminology grasps the way phenomena are matters of concern, rather than matters of fact, for the research subjects

Empirical research · Epistemology · Perspective (graphical) · Phenomenon · Social phenomenon · Social science · Sociology · Terminology · Computer Science · Economic and Social Issues · Philosophy · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Sociology and Education Studies

  • Vom Wissen über das Tun - praxeologische Ansätze für die Geographie von der Analyse bis zur Kritik

    Open Access•Klaus Geiselhart, Jan Winkler et al.•Handbuch Praktiken und Raum•2019

  • Social Practices

    Open Access•Theodore R Schatzki•Social practices•1996

  • Virality

    Tony D Sampson•Virality•2012

  • The Site of the Social

    Theodore R Schatzki•The Site of the Social•2002

  • Habitus und Feld

    Open Access•T Dörfler, Olivier Graefe et al.•Geographica Helvetica•2003

  • Are geographers religiously unmusical? Positionalities in geographical research on religion

    Open Access•Reinhard Henkel•Erdkunde•2011

  • Between perfection and damnation

    Open Access•Dan Cohen•Progress in Human Geography•2017

  • Soziologische Praxistheorien

    Open Access•Frank Hillebrandt•Soziologische Praxistheorien…•2014

  • Practice matters! Geographical inquiry and theories of practice

    Open Access•Jonathan Everts, Matthias Lahr-Kurten et al.•Erdkunde•2011

  • Imagined Futures

    Jens Beckert•Imagined Futures•2016

  • A New Societist Social Ontology

    Open Access•Theodore R Schatzki•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2003

  • Geographies of circulation and exchange

    Open Access•Christian Berndt, Marc Boeckler•Progress in Human Geography•2009

  • Human geography without scale

    Open Access•Sallie A Marston, John Paul Jones et al.•Transactions of the Institute of…•2005

  • Rhetoric, Risk, and Markets

    G Thomas Goodnight, Sandy Green•Quarterly Journal of Speech•2010

  • Caring at a distance

    John Silk•Social & Cultural Geography•2004

  • Theory, Reality, and Performativity in Markets

    Open Access•P Aspers•American Journal of Economics and…•2007

  • Wir sind nie modern gewesen

    Bruno Latour•Wir Sind Nie Modern Gewesen•1995

  • Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern

    Latour, Bruno Latour et al.•Critical Inquiry•2004

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae