Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ethics of decisionism

Carl Schmitt’s theological blind spot

Bibliographic Data

ID18980800
AuthorsMichael Hoelzl (0000-0002-3165-7879, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume20
Issue3
Pages235-246
Publication date2016-07-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal for Cultural Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1479-7585 • E-ISSN: 1740-1666
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14797585.2016.1141831
OpenAlexW2313501552
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited5

In his elaborate historical study Die Diktatur of 1919, C. Schmitt prepares the grounds for his famous definition of sovereignty. Sovereign, as Schmitt will write in his Political Theology five years later, is the one who decides on the state of exception. The following essay analyses the theological origins of Schmitt’s understanding of sovereignty. The problem of sovereignty and his controversy with Hans Kelsen’s programme of legal positivism is the starting point for Schmitt to formulate a general outline of a theory of decisionism. Decisionism as political theory is based on the concept of a rightful deviation from law by personal decision-making in concrete circumstances. The problem of a rightful deviation from law, which will be the focus of my attention, is a well-known problem in legal philosophy and theology. In the following essay, it will be demonstrated how Schmitt evades the theological nature of the problem by drawing attention to Die Diktatur in which the problem of a rightful deviation from law was first systematically analysed. The essay does not primarily intend to explain the absence of the theological and ethical discourses about rightful deviation from law in Schmitt’s work. The aim of the essay is rather to detect a “blind spot” in Schmitt’s general outline of a theory of decisionism and to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of decisionism as theo-political theory

Comparative law · Epistemology · Legal positivism · Philosophy of law · Political philosophy · Political science · Political theology · Politics · Positivism · Sociology · Sovereignty · Theology · German legal, social, and political studies · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • The Transcendental and the Political

    Open Access•Doha S Abdelgawad•Religions•2026

  • Sovereignty, Normalisation and the Unknown

    Open Access•Marta Jaroszewicz•Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd…•2025

  • Activism for End Times

    Stefan Skrimshire•Political Theology•2019

  • Precarious Sovereignty in a Post-liberal Europe

    Open Access•Andrey Makarychev, Tatiana Romashko•Chinese Political Science Review•2020

  • Decisiveness as a logic of political action

    Open Access•Julius Maximilian Rogenhofer•Constellations•2023

  • Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle; Volume 1

    John Alexander Stewart•Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics…•2018

  • The Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics

    Open Access•Georgios Pachymeres•Commentary on Aristotle,…•2022

  • A Greek-English Lexicon of the Septuagint

    Marc Vervenne•Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses•1993

  • Die Nikomachische Ethik

    HG Aristoteles, Aristóteles et al.•Die Nikomachische Ethik•2007

Citations per year0.71
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae