Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Qualitative Evaluation of the Implementation of a Care Pathway for Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Bibliographic Data

ID18983580
AuthorsRuben Van Zelm (0000-0003-0238-6392, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, corresponding author), Ellen Coeckelberghs (0000-0003-0204-2549, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium), Daan Aeyels (0000-0002-8367-9084, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium), Walter Sermeus (0000-0002-5915-1845, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium), Albert Wolthuis (0000-0002-1200-387X, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium), Massimiliano Panella (0000-0003-1880-7198, European Pathway Association, Leuven, Belgium), Kris Vanhaecht (0000-0001-5636-4792, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium)
Year2021
Volume31
Issue2
Pages241-253
Publication date2021-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQualitative Health Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-7323 • E-ISSN: 1552-7557
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1049732320965188
PMID33106115
OpenAlexW3094579863
LanguageEN
References cited21

Colorectal cancer care can be standardized by using enhanced recovery protocols. However, adherence to these protocols varies. Using Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance on process evaluations, we examined the experience of health care professionals in the implementation of a care pathway for colorectal surgery, by describing the intervention, context, implementation, mechanisms, and outcomes. Based on data from semi-structured interviews, we divided respondents into two groups: those who perceived positive outcomes of the implementation and those who perceived no effect. Respondents who perceived positive outcomes reported clinical leadership, use of feedback, positive effects of standardization, and teamwork as factors contributing to positive perceived outcomes. Respondents who perceived no effect reported a lack of organizational support, as well as challenging collaboration and standardization as mechanisms potentially explaining the poorer perception of outcomes. Multiple implementation activities were used, focusing on competence, behavior, or workplace. Our findings suggest that feedback is an important implementation activity

Health care · Medical education · Perception · Qualitative research · Standardization · Teamwork · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Timing of Translation in Cross-Language Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Hudson P Santos, Hudson P O Santos et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2015

  • Achieving Provider Engagement

    Open Access•Agnieszka Ignatowicz, Geva Greenfield et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2014

  • Tool for the Meaningful Consideration of Language Barriers in Qualitative Health Research

    Open Access•Stephanie Premji, Agnieszka Kosny et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae