Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Post‐Deconstruction and the Rhetorics of Touch

Bibliographic Data

ID18985387
AuthorsStephen Dougherty (corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume15
Issue1
Pages75-92
Publication date2011-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal for Cultural Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1479-7585 • E-ISSN: 1740-1666
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14797585.2011.525105
OpenAlexW2077692222
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited7

Discourses of touch have become important discursive sites around which questions concerning the body, its materiality, and its place in the sphere of cultural analysis are currently arrayed — the powers of touch that we postulate influence our understanding of the limits and capacities of both our bodies and the technologies through which we extend our bodily touch. What is at stake in the contestation of touch, then, are really questions about communication and community. How does this bodily reorientation in the humanities and in the social sciences affect our understanding of how we communicate, and what we communicate? How does it impact our thinking about our embodied relation to communication technologies? In order to address these questions, we must first consider how (and why) some of these new rhetorics of touch announce themselves as post‐deconstructive. That is, we must understand that the relation between these new rhetorics of touch and deconstruction is critical to their constitution. This essay explores three books — Ann Weinstone's Avatar Bodies (2004 Weinstone, A. 2004. Avatar Bodies: A Tantra for Posthumanism, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]), Erin Manning's Politics of Touch (2007 Manning, E. 2007. Politics of Touch: Sense, Movement, Sovereignty, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]), and Jean‐Luc Nancy's Being Singular Plural (2000 Nancy, J. 2000. Being Singular Plural, Edited by: Richardson, R. D. and O'Byrne, A. E. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) — wherein this relation is negotiated

Aesthetics · Art · Linguistics · Media studies · Performative utterance · Plural · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Digital Communication and Language · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Law · Philosophy

  • Post-Qualitative Inquiry

    Open Access•P Rautio•Qualitative Inquiry•2021

  • Answering the world

    Open Access•Abi Hackett, P Rautio•International Journal of…•2019

  • Cold War Criticism and the Politics of Skepticism

    Tobin Siebers•Cold War Criticism and the…•1993

  • Gesture and Thought

    Dougal Mcneill, David Mcneill•Gesture and Thought•2005

  • Writing and Difference

    Jacques Derrida, Alan S Bass et al.•Writing and Difference•1980

  • Sensible Flesh

    Elizabeth D Harvey, Elizabeth Harvey et al.•Renaissance and Reformation•2002

  • Cold War Criticism and the Politics of Skepticism

    David F Bell, Tobin Siebers•Modern Language Notes•1993

  • The Theory Mess

    Charles J Stivale•SubStance•2002

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,29
Citation span2019 - 2021 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae