Anthropological Practices of Self-Care
Eventfulness of the Concept
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18992460 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sergey Smirnov (0000-0003-0035-5613, Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management, corresponding author), Sergey A Smirnov |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 306-324 |
| Publication date | 2018-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Siberian Federal University Humanities & Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1997-1370 • E-ISSN: 2313-6014 |
| Publisher | Siberian Federal University (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.17516/1997-1370-0182 |
| OpenAlex | W2777511758 |
| Language | EN |
The present article introduces the concept of anthropological practice as a special practice of transformation and change of a person. The concept is discussed in terms of cultural tradition known as the "self-care" practice. The concept of anthropological practice is regarded from different focuses, primarily from the topic of care: ontological tope, tope of care discourse, tope of care as a practice, tope of care object, tope of care subject. The present research hereby proposes a classification of anthropological practices, where different types of objects and subjects for anthropological practice of care are described from the perspective of this topic. As a result, five types of anthropological practices of self-care are described: "epistrophe", "agon", "mimesis", "cogito" and "autopoiesis". Each type means different identities for a subject of practice, different practices and different teloses, i.e. ultimate objectives of practice. Works of contemporary authors containing analysis and classification of self-care practices in the culture are reviewed
Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Chinese history and philosophy · Psychology · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |