“Reluctant Gatekeeper of the National Inventory” – a Case Study of the Formation of the Faroese Inventory of ICH
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18993288 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tóta Árnadóttir (0000-0003-4324-0621, University of the Faroe Islands, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 501-518 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Slovenský národopis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1335-1303 • E-ISSN: 1339-9357 |
| Publisher | Central Library of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2478/se-2021-0030 |
| OpenAlex | W4206995910 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
As the Faroe Islands ratified the 2003 UNESCO Convention in 2018 and immediately began to develop a National Inventory, the Faroese Ministry of Culture appointed "expert" representatives of the National Museum and the University of the Faroese Islands for a small assisting committee tasked with assessing and possibly editing proposals for the inventory. The present article is based on reflections from an insider perspective of the process, as the author is one of the members participating in the preparations. The various "candidates" submitted for the inventory are presented and discussed in relation to the analyses of the parliament debates preceding the ratification and media coverage before and after the Convention was passed in the Faroese Parliament. How and by whom is the inventory formed in theory and in practice? What is the appropriate role of scholars in the process? The article suggests that the participation of academic experts as "gatekeepers" of inventories can be used to lend credibility of specific selections of intangible cultural heritage worthy of safeguarding within a particular national community. This is problematic from an academic point of view, since scholars can easily get tangled up in essentialist and outdated understandings of national culture as they enter a stage operating by different objectives than the academic discourse of critical enquiry
Business · Archaeological Research and Protection · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Museums and Cultural Heritage
Between Imagined Communities of Practice
Intangible Heritage
Making Intangible Heritage
Uses of Heritage
Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage in the 2003 Unesco Convention
Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production1
Proving participation
Unesco on the Ground
Switzerland and the Unesco Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage
Bonding and dissonance
Public folklore dialogism and critical heritage studies
Making degrowth locally meaningful
Collective Memory and Cultural Identity
Discourses of heritage
Mistaken Dichotomies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |