Implications of Tenure Insecurity for Aboriginal Land Use in Canada
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 18993293 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D C Natcher (0000-0002-4992-0575, University of Saskatchewan, corresponding author), Clifford G Hickey (University of Alberta), Clifford Hickey (0000-0003-2275-8130), Mark Nelson (0000-0001-9941-7161), Susan Schaefer Davis, Susan Davis (0000-0002-9455-3794) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 245-257 |
| Publication date | 2009-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-7259 • E-ISSN: 1938-3517 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17730/humo.68.3.60pp7583m183t1t1 |
| OpenAlex | W2092358397 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 25 |
In Canada, Aboriginal peoples are succeeding at regaining portions of their traditional land base. Accomplished through the signing of historic treaties and the negotiation of comprehensive land claims agreements, nearly seven percent of Canada's entire land base is now under the administrative authority of Aboriginal governments. Notwithstanding these accomplishments, it remains unclear whether such territorial gains coincide with a heightened sense of tenure security. Together with the Little Red River Cree Nation of Alberta and the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation of the Yukon Territory, we set out to learn how First Nation members perceive their access to traditional lands to be changing over time and by generation. Findings indicate that despite various tenure reforms, First Nation members remain concerned that their traditional territories are susceptible to the interests of others. Given that perceptions of tenure security informs the basis by which people exploit resources, these conditions could potentially intensify into conflict with those who are seen as benefiting at the expense of First Nation members and propagate behaviors yielding higher short-term benefits leading to the over-exploitation of natural resources. While grounded in two Canadian case studies, the findings of this research have broad implications for other countries that are using treaties and other modern forms of agreement making to restructure land tenure arrangements with Aboriginal peoples
Agriculture · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Land tenure · Natural resource · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Restructuring · Sociology · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Land Rights and Reforms · Law · Mining and Resource Management
Sustainable Biomass Energy and Indigenous Cultural Models of Well-being in an Alaska Forest Ecosystem
Subsistence, regional planning and the cultural carrying capacity of First Nations in Alberta, Canada
Traditional use of medicinal plants in the boreal forest of Canada
Indigenous Peoples' Expectations for Forestry in New Brunswick
Network political ecology
Skyscrapers hide the heavens
Economic analysis of law
Land Rights Systems and Agricultural Development in Sub-Saharan Africa
The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights
Land Reform Policies, the Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas
Governing the Commons
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
The political ecology of Yukon forestry
Managing the Cumulative Impacts of Land Uses in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin
The tenure factor in wildlife conservation
Co-Management
Putting the Community Back Into Community-Based Resource Management
Uncommon property
Tenure security, private time preference, and use of natural resources among lowland Bolivian Amerindians
Rethinking Devolution
The causes of tropical deforestation in Ecuador
The Tragedy of the Commons
Land Tenure and Investment in African Agriculture
Land Tenure Insecurity and Inequality in Nicaragua
Best Practice' Options for the Legal Recognition of Customary Tenure
Institutional Failure in Resource Management
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2017 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |